PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCNTX vs. FYHTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCNTX vs. FYHTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNTX achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly lower than FYHTX's 15.67% return.


FCNTX

1D
0.64%
1M
-0.59%
6M
9.47%
YTD
10.69%
1Y
20.54%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
17.57%

FYHTX

1D
0.56%
1M
0.93%
6M
10.88%
YTD
15.67%
1Y
24.14%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNTX vs. FYHTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
10.69%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%12.47%
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund
15.67%14.72%4.73%-8.62%15.32%26.43%-3.84%6.91%-11.71%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNTX and FYHTX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2017

0.20

The correlation between FCNTX and FYHTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCNTX vs. FYHTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FYHTX
FYHTX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FYHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FYHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNTX vs. FYHTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCNTXFYHTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.94

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

6.45

+1.02

FCNTX vs. FYHTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the FYHTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNTX and FYHTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCNTX vs. FYHTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNTX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, which is greater than FYHTX's maximum drawdown of -33.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNTX and FYHTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCNTXFYHTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.19%

-33.22%

-15.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-12.55%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.75%

-12.55%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

-25.47%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-7.39%

+6.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-11.90%

+3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

3.77%

-1.02%

Volatility

FCNTX vs. FYHTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) at 4.07%. This indicates that FCNTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYHTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCNTXFYHTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

4.07%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.19%

11.78%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

14.14%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.36%

15.83%

+3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

14.47%

+5.24%

FCNTX vs. FYHTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNTX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FYHTX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCNTX vs. FYHTX - Dividend Comparison

FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than FYHTX's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.22%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund
2.53%2.93%3.78%4.10%57.34%15.05%0.00%7.00%12.49%0.36%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCNTX and FYHTX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to FYHTX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNTX dropped -49.19% vs FYHTX's -33.22%.

FYHTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCNTX and FYHTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer