PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCNSX vs. HNCYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCNSX vs. HNCYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) and Hartford International Growth Fund (HNCYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNSX achieves a 11.65% return, which is significantly higher than HNCYX's 6.10% return.


FCNSX

1D
0.46%
1M
4.45%
6M
11.65%
YTD
11.65%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.89%

HNCYX

1D
4.23%
1M
-4.36%
6M
2.29%
YTD
6.10%
1Y
18.46%
3Y*
13.02%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
8.37%
ALL TIME*
5.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCNSX vs. HNCYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCNSX
Fidelity Series Canada Fund
11.65%28.56%9.88%15.95%-6.88%28.62%4.47%27.78%-15.01%10.10%
HNCYX
Hartford International Growth Fund
6.10%27.17%8.24%18.79%-27.84%3.91%23.50%27.87%-14.37%8.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNSX and HNCYX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2017

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between FCNSX and HNCYX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCNSX vs. HNCYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCNSX
FCNSX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FCNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HNCYX
HNCYX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
HNCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HNCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCNSX vs. HNCYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) and Hartford International Growth Fund (HNCYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCNSXHNCYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.13

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

1.03

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

3.42

+6.95

FCNSX vs. HNCYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the HNCYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNSX and HNCYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCNSX vs. HNCYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNSX drawdown since its inception was -41.47%, smaller than the maximum HNCYX drawdown of -68.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNSX and HNCYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCNSXHNCYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.47%

-68.17%

+26.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.48%

-15.13%

+7.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

-19.38%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.35%

-43.89%

+22.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.96%

+8.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-18.36%

+13.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

4.56%

-2.38%

Volatility

FCNSX vs. HNCYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) is 2.46%, while Hartford International Growth Fund (HNCYX) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that FCNSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HNCYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCNSXHNCYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

8.42%

-5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

21.15%

-10.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

23.91%

-10.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

21.03%

-4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

19.21%

-0.76%

FCNSX vs. HNCYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than HNCYX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCNSX vs. HNCYX - Dividend Comparison

FCNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than HNCYX's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNSX
Fidelity Series Canada Fund
1.84%2.06%3.05%3.42%3.12%2.20%2.14%2.24%2.51%1.07%0.00%0.00%
HNCYX
Hartford International Growth Fund
1.22%1.30%0.39%0.76%1.07%0.83%3.27%0.85%8.81%0.81%1.57%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCNSX and HNCYX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HNCYX has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to FCNSX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNSX dropped -41.47% vs HNCYX's -68.17%.

FCNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCNSX and HNCYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer