PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCNSX vs. GSIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCNSX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNSX achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly higher than GSIMX's 3.65% return.


FCNSX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
5.77%
6M
4.82%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*

GSIMX

1D
0.22%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
3.65%
6M
3.74%
1Y
9.87%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNSX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCNSX
Fidelity Series Canada Fund
5.77%28.56%9.88%15.95%-6.88%28.62%4.47%27.78%-15.01%10.10%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
3.65%20.85%9.66%22.10%-11.06%12.50%15.77%27.64%-6.04%8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNSX and GSIMX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2017

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between FCNSX and GSIMX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCNSX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNSX
FCNSX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FCNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIMX
GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNSX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCNSXGSIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.20

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

1.35

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.51

4.15

+4.36

FCNSX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNSX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCNSX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNSX drawdown since its inception was -41.47%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNSX and GSIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCNSXGSIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.47%

-28.84%

-12.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.48%

-7.81%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

-10.32%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.35%

-25.37%

+4.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-6.24%

+3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-4.81%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.53%

-0.38%

Volatility

FCNSX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Canada Fund (FCNSX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.83%. This indicates that FCNSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCNSXGSIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

2.83%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

8.21%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.07%

9.89%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

14.37%

+1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

15.67%

+2.86%

FCNSX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCNSX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

FCNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than GSIMX's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCNSX
Fidelity Series Canada Fund
1.94%2.06%3.05%3.42%3.12%2.20%2.14%2.24%2.51%1.07%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.94%5.12%11.18%2.36%4.89%2.23%0.18%0.65%0.53%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCNSX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNSX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to GSIMX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNSX dropped -41.47% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

FCNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCNSX and GSIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer