FCNS.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO
FCNS.NEO (Fidelity All-in-One Conservative ETF) and CSBG.NEO (CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FCNS.NEO returned 11.65% vs 0.49% for CSBG.NEO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. FCNS.NEO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for CSBG.NEO.
Performance
FCNS.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCNS.NEO achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly higher than CSBG.NEO's 0.49% return.
FCNS.NEO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 1Y
- 11.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.36%
CSBG.NEO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 0.49%
- 3Y*
- 0.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$0.00 | CA$0.00 | CA$0.00 | |
| CA$2.87M | CA$3.68M | CA$3.34M |
FCNS.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FCNS.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Conservative ETF | 5.61% | 9.95% | 9.08% |
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF | 0.49% | 0.00% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCNS.NEO and CSBG.NEO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCNS.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
FCNS.NEO
CSBG.NEO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FCNS.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Conservative ETF (FCNS.NEO) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCNS.NEO | CSBG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.35 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCNS.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCNS.NEO drawdown since its inception was -6.45%, which is greater than CSBG.NEO's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNS.NEO and CSBG.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCNS.NEO | CSBG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | 0.00% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.85% | 0.00% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | 0.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | 0.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | 0.00% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | 0.00% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 0.00% | +1.25% |
Volatility
FCNS.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity All-in-One Conservative ETF (FCNS.NEO) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO) at 0.49%. This indicates that FCNS.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSBG.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCNS.NEO | CSBG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 0.49% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.82% | 0.49% | +5.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.88% | 0.49% | +6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.92% | 1.03% | +5.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.92% | 1.11% | +5.81% |
FCNS.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCNS.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CSBG.NEO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCNS.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Dividend Comparison
FCNS.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than CSBG.NEO's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF | 0.48% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 1.21% | 0.27% |
FCNS.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Conservative ETF | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCNS.NEO and CSBG.NEO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCNS.NEO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCNS.NEO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CSBG.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and CIBC. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FCNS.NEO and 0.90% for CSBG.NEO.
Find the right allocation for FCNS.NEO and CSBG.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer