PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCMVX vs. PVMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCMVX vs. PVMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCMVX achieves a 19.80% return, which is significantly higher than PVMIX's 12.62% return.


FCMVX

1D
0.27%
1M
3.36%
YTD
19.80%
6M
20.81%
1Y
38.86%
3Y*
44.29%
5Y*
24.18%
10Y*

PVMIX

1D
0.23%
1M
1.52%
YTD
12.62%
6M
12.05%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCMVX vs. PVMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund
19.80%12.62%87.16%23.07%-10.26%34.12%0.52%23.65%-18.69%12.67%
PVMIX
Principal MidCap Value Fund I
12.62%6.09%33.38%11.04%-5.95%30.97%6.50%26.69%-11.07%10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FCMVX and PVMIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017

0.95

The correlation between FCMVX and PVMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCMVX vs. PVMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCMVX
FCMVX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FCMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FCMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PVMIX
PVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCMVX vs. PVMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCMVXPVMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

2.66

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.47

9.43

+5.04

FCMVX vs. PVMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the PVMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCMVX and PVMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCMVXPVMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

1.67

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.65

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.54

-0.17

Drawdowns

FCMVX vs. PVMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCMVX drawdown since its inception was -44.63%, smaller than the maximum PVMIX drawdown of -56.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCMVX and PVMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCMVXPVMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.63%

-56.76%

+12.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-7.37%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.56%

-16.78%

-21.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.56%

-17.05%

-21.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

0.00%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-6.84%

-2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.07%

+0.57%

Volatility

FCMVX vs. PVMIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Principal MidCap Value Fund I (PVMIX) at 3.07%. This indicates that FCMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCMVXPVMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

3.07%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

8.47%

+3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

11.74%

+4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.58%

18.25%

+42.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.78%

19.21%

+28.57%

FCMVX vs. PVMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCMVX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PVMIX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCMVX vs. PVMIX - Dividend Comparison

FCMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than PVMIX's 6.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund
4.13%6.68%76.67%1.29%1.68%1.39%2.19%1.68%2.99%0.77%0.00%0.00%
PVMIX
Principal MidCap Value Fund I
6.41%7.22%33.98%4.63%7.12%11.44%1.38%5.11%13.23%6.92%1.58%11.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FCMVX and PVMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCMVX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to PVMIX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCMVX dropped -44.63% vs PVMIX's -56.76%.

FCMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCMVX and PVMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer