PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCMVX vs. HOMPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCMVX vs. HOMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and HW Opportunities MP Fund (HOMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCMVX achieves a 26.80% return, which is significantly higher than HOMPX's 18.18% return.


FCMVX

1D
0.38%
1M
1.66%
6M
19.92%
YTD
26.80%
1Y
42.22%
3Y*
41.69%
5Y*
26.05%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.83%

HOMPX

1D
1.01%
1M
2.87%
6M
12.69%
YTD
18.18%
1Y
24.98%
3Y*
13.67%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCMVX vs. HOMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FCMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund
26.80%12.62%87.16%23.07%-10.26%28.07%
HOMPX
HW Opportunities MP Fund
18.18%11.44%3.87%29.55%-5.23%29.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FCMVX and HOMPX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021

0.85

The correlation between FCMVX and HOMPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCMVX vs. HOMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCMVX
FCMVX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FCMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FCMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

HOMPX
HOMPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
HOMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HOMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCMVX vs. HOMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and HW Opportunities MP Fund (HOMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCMVXHOMPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

2.46

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.09

8.02

+7.07

FCMVX vs. HOMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the HOMPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCMVX and HOMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCMVX vs. HOMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCMVX drawdown since its inception was -44.63%, which is greater than HOMPX's maximum drawdown of -23.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCMVX and HOMPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCMVXHOMPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.63%

-23.25%

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-9.67%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.56%

-18.78%

-19.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.56%

-23.25%

-15.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.61%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-4.40%

-4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.96%

-0.36%

Volatility

FCMVX vs. HOMPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to HW Opportunities MP Fund (HOMPX) at 2.57%. This indicates that FCMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCMVXHOMPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

2.57%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

11.07%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.51%

14.68%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.59%

19.02%

+41.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.41%

18.89%

+28.52%

FCMVX vs. HOMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCMVX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HOMPX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCMVX vs. HOMPX - Dividend Comparison

FCMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than HOMPX's 3.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund
3.90%6.68%76.67%1.29%1.68%1.39%2.19%1.68%2.99%0.77%
HOMPX
HW Opportunities MP Fund
3.06%3.61%9.48%6.79%1.89%1.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCMVX and HOMPX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCMVX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to HOMPX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCMVX dropped -44.63% vs HOMPX's -23.25%.

FCMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCMVX and HOMPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer