FCMVX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX).

FCMVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 25, 2017. FSPGX is managed by Fidelity.

Performance

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund	3.66%	12.62%	87.16%	23.07%	-10.26%	34.12%	0.52%	23.65%	-18.69%	12.67%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	-9.77%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	12.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCMVX achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's -9.77% return.

FCMVX

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -6.62%
• YTD: 3.66%
• 6M: 8.52%
• 1Y: 22.09%
• 3Y*: 38.07%
• 5Y*: 22.17%
• 10Y*: —

FSPGX

• 1D: 3.75%
• 1M: -5.52%
• YTD: -9.77%
• 6M: -9.26%
• 1Y: 17.78%
• 3Y*: 21.16%
• 5Y*: 12.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCMVX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

FCMVX

Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund

FSPGX

Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund

Return for Risk

FCMVX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCMVX

FCMVX Risk / Return Rank: 56
FCMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FCMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FCMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FCMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
FCMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 41
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCMVX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	0.84	+0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	1.36	+0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.19	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	1.17	+0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.84	4.02	+1.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCMVX and FSPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCMVX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	0.84	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.58	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.80	-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between FCMVX and FSPGX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FCMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than FSPGX's 0.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund	4.77%	6.68%	76.67%	1.29%	1.68%	1.39%	2.19%	1.68%	2.99%	0.77%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.38%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%

Drawdowns

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCMVX drawdown since its inception was -44.63%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCMVX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCMVX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.63%	-32.66%	-11.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.60%	-16.17%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.56%	-32.66%	-5.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.48%	-13.03%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.44%	-6.43%	-3.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	4.70%	-1.10%

Volatility

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) have volatilities of 6.50% and 6.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCMVX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.50%	6.71%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.02%	12.37%	-0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.54%	22.58%	-1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.56%	21.52%	+39.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.20%	21.66%	+26.54%