FCMVX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FCMVX (Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FCMVX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FCMVX returned 24.18%/yr vs 15.40%/yr for FSPGX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCMVX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCMVX achieves a 19.80% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 7.15% return.

FCMVX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 19.80%
• 6M: 20.81%
• 1Y: 38.86%
• 3Y*: 44.29%
• 5Y*: 24.18%
• 10Y*: —

FSPGX

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 5.13%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 6.29%
• 1Y: 25.29%
• 3Y*: 24.97%
• 5Y*: 15.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund	19.80%	12.62%	87.16%	23.07%	-10.26%	34.12%	0.52%	23.65%	-18.69%	12.67%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	7.15%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FCMVX and FSPGX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017	0.64

The correlation between FCMVX and FSPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCMVX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCMVX

FCMVX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FCMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FCMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FCMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FCMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FCMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCMVX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	1.67	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	2.29	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.29	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	1.60	+2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.47	5.36	+9.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCMVX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCMVX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	1.67	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.72	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.89	-0.52

Drawdowns

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCMVX drawdown since its inception was -44.63%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCMVX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCMVX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.63%	-32.66%	-11.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.21%	-16.17%	+5.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.56%	-23.32%	-15.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.56%	-32.66%	-5.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-1.70%	+1.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.35%	-6.37%	-2.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	4.81%	-2.17%

Volatility

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 3.68%. This indicates that FCMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCMVX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.64%	3.68%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.97%	11.65%	+0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.21%	15.45%	+0.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.58%	21.50%	+39.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.78%	21.55%	+26.23%

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCMVX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCMVX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FCMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund	4.13%	6.68%	76.67%	1.29%	1.68%	1.39%	2.19%	1.68%	2.99%	0.77%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCMVX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

FCMVX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCMVX or FSPGX?

FCMVX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to FSPGX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCMVX dropped -44.63% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.