FCLTX vs. IDE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCLTX (Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M) and IDE (Voya Infrastructure, Industrials and Materials Fund) are both Industrials Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FCLTX returned 13.53%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for IDE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCLTX charges 1.27%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for IDE.

Performance

FCLTX vs. IDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) and Voya Infrastructure, Industrials and Materials Fund (IDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCLTX achieves a 13.44% return, which is significantly lower than IDE's 17.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FCLTX has outperformed IDE with an annualized return of 13.53%, while IDE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.95% annualized return.

FCLTX

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 13.44%
• 6M: 14.53%
• 1Y: 25.72%
• 3Y*: 28.92%
• 5Y*: 15.92%
• 10Y*: 13.53%

IDE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.94%
• YTD: 17.18%
• 6M: 22.83%
• 1Y: 36.83%
• 3Y*: 26.96%
• 5Y*: 13.42%
• 10Y*: 11.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLTX vs. IDE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCLTX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M	13.44%	24.14%	27.80%	22.34%	-10.87%	15.97%	10.89%	27.44%	-16.03%	19.25%
IDE Voya Infrastructure, Industrials and Materials Fund	17.18%	35.77%	11.96%	22.04%	-16.54%	26.27%	-1.06%	13.49%	-24.48%	39.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLTX and IDE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2010	0.60

The correlation between FCLTX and IDE shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCLTX vs. IDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLTX

FCLTX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FCLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FCLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FCLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FCLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FCLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

IDE

IDE Risk / Return Rank: 63
IDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
IDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IDE Omega Ratio Rank: 75
IDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
IDE Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLTX vs. IDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) and Voya Infrastructure, Industrials and Materials Fund (IDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCLTX	IDE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.64	-1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	3.40	-1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.49	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	2.58	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.39	9.25	-0.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCLTX vs. IDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the IDE Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLTX and IDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCLTX	IDE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	2.64	-1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.77	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.57	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.40	+0.10

Drawdowns

FCLTX vs. IDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLTX drawdown since its inception was -61.07%, which is greater than IDE's maximum drawdown of -52.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLTX and IDE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCLTX	IDE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.07%	-52.43%	-8.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	-14.34%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.35%	-18.30%	-3.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.59%	-29.36%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.73%	-52.43%	+9.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	-0.29%	-2.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.36%	-11.30%	+2.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	3.99%	-0.75%

Volatility

FCLTX vs. IDE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to Voya Infrastructure, Industrials and Materials Fund (IDE) at 2.63%. This indicates that FCLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCLTX	IDE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.95%	2.63%	+3.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.09%	11.59%	+3.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.26%	14.02%	+4.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.86%	18.04%	+2.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.50%	20.91%	+0.59%

FCLTX vs. IDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLTX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than IDE's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCLTX vs. IDE - Dividend Comparison

FCLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than IDE's 9.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCLTX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M	1.60%	1.82%	7.91%	8.95%	3.54%	22.27%	0.60%	7.40%	12.19%	2.81%	5.59%	9.09%
IDE Voya Infrastructure, Industrials and Materials Fund	9.36%	10.57%	12.11%	9.00%	9.99%	7.58%	8.89%	9.02%	16.46%	6.88%	10.67%	12.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCLTX and IDE in my portfolio?

FCLTX and IDE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCLTX or IDE?

FCLTX has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to IDE (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLTX dropped -61.07% vs IDE's -52.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.