PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCLIX vs. LCSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCLIX vs. LCSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund I Class (FCLIX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FCLIX has outperformed LCSIX with an annualized return of 14.33%, while LCSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.54% annualized return.


FCLIX

1D
0.40%
1M
3.78%
6M
13.61%
YTD
19.92%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
28.10%
5Y*
18.06%
10Y*
14.33%

LCSIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-2.38%
6M
0.47%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
-1.68%
3Y*
-2.20%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*
2.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLIX vs. LCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCLIX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund I Class
19.92%24.80%28.57%22.99%-10.41%16.61%11.48%28.14%-15.58%19.30%
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
0.00%1.13%-8.29%-3.07%6.04%14.90%9.90%-5.97%15.16%6.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLIX and LCSIX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2012

-0.04

The correlation between FCLIX and LCSIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCLIX vs. LCSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLIX
FCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

LCSIX
LCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
LCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
LCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLIX vs. LCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund I Class (FCLIX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCLIXLCSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.96

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

-0.32

+2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

-0.74

+8.81

FCLIX vs. LCSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the LCSIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLIX and LCSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCLIX vs. LCSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLIX drawdown since its inception was -60.76%, which is greater than LCSIX's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLIX and LCSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCLIXLCSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.76%

-25.13%

-35.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.09%

-4.97%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.26%

-11.60%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.34%

-13.21%

-13.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.69%

-13.54%

-29.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-11.21%

+8.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-6.39%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.14%

+1.12%

Volatility

FCLIX vs. LCSIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund I Class (FCLIX) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) at 1.32%. This indicates that FCLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCLIXLCSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

1.32%

+6.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.10%

4.77%

+11.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.64%

5.94%

+13.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.06%

5.51%

+15.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.54%

6.66%

+14.88%

FCLIX vs. LCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LCSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCLIX vs. LCSIX - Dividend Comparison

FCLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than LCSIX's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCLIX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund I Class
1.31%1.58%8.07%8.08%3.30%20.72%0.55%7.31%11.97%2.66%5.69%9.05%
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
2.32%2.32%2.75%1.88%10.75%7.14%2.94%0.54%12.36%0.02%3.21%7.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCLIX and LCSIX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCLIX has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to LCSIX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLIX dropped -60.76% vs LCSIX's -25.13%.

FCLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCLIX and LCSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer