PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCLD vs. TDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCLD vs. TDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCLD achieves a 33.66% return, which is significantly higher than TDV's 14.99% return.


FCLD

1D
1.33%
1M
4.17%
6M
35.89%
YTD
33.66%
1Y
45.67%
3Y*
24.29%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.63%

TDV

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.57%
6M
11.45%
YTD
14.99%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$599.13K$567.95K$795.73K
$551.98K$539.76K$593.04K

FCLD vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FCLD
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
33.66%8.19%21.80%53.05%-41.32%-1.59%
TDV
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
14.99%16.05%9.72%27.29%-15.94%11.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLD and TDV is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021

0.74

The correlation between FCLD and TDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCLD vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCLD
FCLD Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FCLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TDV
TDV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDV Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCLD vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCLDTDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.19

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.48

5.76

-0.27

FCLD vs. TDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the TDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLD and TDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCLD vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLD drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, which is greater than TDV's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLD and TDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCLDTDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.85%

-32.78%

-18.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.48%

-9.55%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.80%

-22.51%

-12.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-6.97%

+2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.08%

-5.37%

-14.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.31%

3.63%

+3.68%

Volatility

FCLD vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) has a higher volatility of 6.98% compared to ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) at 5.85%. This indicates that FCLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCLDTDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.98%

5.85%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.27%

15.38%

+6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.80%

19.42%

+9.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.39%

20.83%

+9.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.39%

23.27%

+7.12%

FCLD vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TDV's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCLD vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison

FCLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than TDV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FCLD
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
0.01%0.03%0.13%0.17%0.26%0.13%0.00%0.00%
TDV
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
1.06%1.09%1.16%1.16%1.67%1.08%1.10%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCLD and TDV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCLD has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to TDV (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLD dropped -50.85% vs TDV's -32.78%.

On 3-year performance, FCLD leads with 24.29% vs 14.78% for TDV. On fees, FCLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FCLD has performed better with a 24.29% return vs 14.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for TDV.

TDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.01% for FCLD.

FCLD tracks Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TDV tracks S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FCLD and 0.45% for TDV.

FCLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCLD and TDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer