FCLD vs. QQQ
FCLD (Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCLD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FCLD returned 28.24%/yr vs 28.78%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCLD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
FCLD vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCLD achieves a 34.57% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.30% return.
FCLD
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 19.91%
- YTD
- 34.57%
- 6M
- 36.74%
- 1Y
- 45.14%
- 3Y*
- 28.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
FCLD vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 34.57% | 8.19% | 21.80% | 53.05% | -41.32% | -1.32% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 9.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLD and QQQ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FCLD and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FCLD vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCLD
QQQ
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FCLD
QQQ
Real Estate
FCLD
QQQ
Communication Services
FCLD
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
FCLD
QQQ
Basic Materials
FCLD
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
FCLD
-
QQQ
Energy
FCLD
-
QQQ
Financial Services
FCLD
-
QQQ
Healthcare
FCLD
-
QQQ
Industrials
FCLD
-
QQQ
Utilities
FCLD
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLD vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
FCLD
QQQ
FCLD vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCLD | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.45 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 3.51 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 13.49 | -6.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCLD | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.64 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.41 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
FCLD vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLD drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLD and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLD | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.85% | -82.97% | +32.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.48% | -11.96% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.80% | -22.77% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -0.26% | -3.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.51% | -32.79% | +12.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | 3.11% | +3.53% |
Volatility
FCLD vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that FCLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLD | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | 4.49% | +5.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.07% | 12.10% | +9.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.40% | 15.94% | +11.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 22.38% | +8.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 22.29% | +8.21% |
FCLD vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLD vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
FCLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCLD and QQQ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCLD has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLD dropped -50.85% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 3-year performance, QQQ leads with 28.78% vs 28.24% for FCLD. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 28.78% return vs 28.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FCLD.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.02% for FCLD.
FCLD is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. FCLD tracks Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FCLD and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCLD and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer