FCLD vs. GGME
FCLD (Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF) and GGME (Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - FCLD tracks the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross while GGME tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FCLD returned 28.24%/yr vs 24.13%/yr for GGME. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCLD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GGME.
Performance
FCLD vs. GGME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCLD achieves a 34.57% return, which is significantly higher than GGME's 7.37% return.
FCLD
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 19.91%
- YTD
- 34.57%
- 6M
- 36.74%
- 1Y
- 45.14%
- 3Y*
- 28.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGME
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 12.63%
- YTD
- 7.37%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 13.51%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
FCLD vs. GGME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 34.57% | 8.19% | 21.80% | 53.05% | -41.32% | -1.32% |
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | 7.37% | 16.39% | 32.67% | 23.76% | -36.43% | -7.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLD and GGME is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between FCLD and GGME shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FCLD vs. GGME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCLD
GGME
Technology
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FCLD
GGME
Real Estate
FCLD
GGME
-
Communication Services
FCLD
GGME
Consumer Cyclical
FCLD
GGME
Basic Materials
FCLD
-
GGME
-
Consumer Defensive
FCLD
-
GGME
-
Energy
FCLD
-
GGME
-
Financial Services
FCLD
-
GGME
Healthcare
FCLD
-
GGME
-
Industrials
FCLD
-
GGME
Utilities
FCLD
-
GGME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCLD vs. GGME — Risk / Return Rank
FCLD
GGME
FCLD vs. GGME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) and Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCLD | GGME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.14 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 0.54 | +2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 1.21 | +5.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCLD | GGME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 0.73 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.34 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FCLD vs. GGME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLD drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, smaller than the maximum GGME drawdown of -69.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLD and GGME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLD | GGME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.85% | -69.13% | +18.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.48% | -25.23% | +7.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.80% | -25.23% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -2.98% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.51% | -14.54% | -5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | 11.22% | -4.58% |
Volatility
FCLD vs. GGME - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) at 5.12%. This indicates that FCLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCLD | GGME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | 5.12% | +5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.07% | 14.30% | +7.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.40% | 18.63% | +8.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 24.16% | +6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 23.14% | +7.36% |
FCLD vs. GGME - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GGME's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCLD vs. GGME - Dividend Comparison
FCLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than GGME's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.08% | 2.31% | 0.76% | 0.39% | 0.38% | 0.50% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.16% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCLD and GGME have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCLD has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to GGME (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLD dropped -50.85% vs GGME's -69.13%.
On 3-year performance, FCLD leads with 28.24% vs 24.13% for GGME. On fees, FCLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, GGME has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FCLD has performed better with a 28.24% return vs 24.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GGME.
GGME has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.02% for FCLD.
FCLD tracks Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GGME tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FCLD and 0.60% for GGME.
FCLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCLD and GGME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer