FCLCX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FCLCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FCLCX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCLCX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLCX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C | 0.59% | 23.55% | 28.16% | 21.74% | -11.33% | 15.36% | 10.36% | 26.81% | -16.46% | 18.67% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCLCX achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FCLCX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 11.75%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
FCLCX
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -12.61%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 28.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCLCX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCLCX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCLCX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FCLCX
FSKAX
FCLCX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCLCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 0.83 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 1.29 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.19 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 1.04 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.50 | 5.05 | +2.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCLCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 0.83 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.59 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.72 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.78 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCLCX and FSKAX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCLCX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FCLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCLCX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C | 2.18% | 2.19% | 9.45% | 10.59% | 4.10% | 24.59% | 0.68% | 7.65% | 13.22% | 2.98% | 5.82% | 9.58% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FCLCX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCLCX drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLCX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCLCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.33% | -35.01% | -26.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.32% | -12.42% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | -25.39% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.77% | -35.01% | -7.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.16% | -8.92% | -4.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -4.05% | -4.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 2.57% | +0.84% |
Volatility
FCLCX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class C (FCLCX) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 4.42%. This indicates that FCLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCLCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 4.42% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 9.40% | +3.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.51% | 18.50% | +4.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 17.38% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.40% | 18.42% | +2.98% |