FCIV.TO vs. QDXH.TO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FCIV.TO (Fidelity International Value ETF) and QDXH.TO (Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FCIV.TO tracks the Fidelity Canada International Value Index while QDXH.TO tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Hedged to CAD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCIV.TO returned 16.79%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for QDXH.TO. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FCIV.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for QDXH.TO.

Performance

FCIV.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QDXH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCIV.TO achieves a 21.38% return, which is significantly higher than QDXH.TO's 12.29% return.

FCIV.TO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.83%
• 6M: 10.82%
• YTD: 21.38%
• 1Y: 36.56%
• 3Y*: 22.55%
• 5Y*: 16.79%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.34%

QDXH.TO

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -0.49%
• 6M: 7.65%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 1Y: 24.27%
• 3Y*: 16.55%
• 5Y*: 12.27%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCIV.TO Fidelity International Value ETF	CA$1.12M	CA$1.36M	CA$2.02M
QDXH.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	CA$99.52K	CA$61.24K	CA$41.60K

FCIV.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCIV.TO Fidelity International Value ETF	21.38%	33.60%	6.89%	22.75%	-0.22%	14.15%	4.49%
QDXH.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	12.29%	21.99%	13.25%	14.25%	-2.55%	20.52%	6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FCIV.TO and QDXH.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020	0.23

FCIV.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCIV.TO	QDXH.TO
Financial Services	31.0%	24.5%
Energy	11.8%	3.4%
Industrials	11.1%	18.8%
Consumer Defensive	10.1%	6.8%
Real Estate	8.5%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	7.8%
Technology	6.5%	12.1%
Healthcare	3.2%	10.4%
Communication Services	1.2%	4.4%
Basic Materials	-	5.8%
Utilities	-	3.7%

Return for Risk

FCIV.TO vs. QDXH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCIV.TO

FCIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FCIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FCIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FCIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FCIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

QDXH.TO

QDXH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
QDXH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QDXH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
QDXH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
QDXH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QDXH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCIV.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) and Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QDXH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCIV.TO	QDXH.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	2.01	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.37	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.61	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.18	2.47	+1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.74	10.33	+5.41

FCIV.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the QDXH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIV.TO and QDXH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCIV.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, smaller than the maximum QDXH.TO drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIV.TO and QDXH.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCIV.TO	QDXH.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.27%	-31.75%	+7.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	-9.85%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.59%	-13.49%	-3.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.27%	-15.79%	-8.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.71%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-3.81%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	2.36%	-0.08%

Volatility

FCIV.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (QDXH.TO) at 3.12%. This indicates that FCIV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDXH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCIV.TO	QDXH.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	3.12%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.17%	10.43%	+0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.66%	12.14%	+2.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.26%	12.78%	+2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.47%	15.42%	+0.05%

FCIV.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCIV.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QDXH.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCIV.TO vs. QDXH.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than QDXH.TO's 2.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCIV.TO Fidelity International Value ETF	2.06%	2.09%	2.80%	3.64%	3.45%	2.97%	0.90%	0.00%	0.00%
QDXH.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	2.29%	2.41%	2.64%	2.76%	2.92%	2.28%	1.96%	2.65%	3.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCIV.TO and QDXH.TO in my portfolio?

FCIV.TO and QDXH.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCIV.TO or QDXH.TO?

On fees, QDXH.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCIV.TO or QDXH.TO?

QDXH.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCIV.TO.

What is the main difference between FCIV.TO and QDXH.TO?

FCIV.TO tracks Fidelity Canada International Value Index, while QDXH.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Hedged to CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCIV.TO and 0.17% for QDXH.TO.