FCIM.NEO vs. XMTM.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FCIM.NEO (Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF) and XMTM.TO (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF) are both Momentum funds - FCIM.NEO tracks the Fidelity Canada International Momentum Index while XMTM.TO tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCIM.NEO returned 18.33%/yr vs 17.66%/yr for XMTM.TO. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCIM.NEO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for XMTM.TO.

Performance

FCIM.NEO vs. XMTM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCIM.NEO achieves a 20.61% return, which is significantly lower than XMTM.TO's 31.92% return.

FCIM.NEO

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 6.20%
• YTD: 20.61%
• 6M: 23.45%
• 1Y: 38.70%
• 3Y*: 31.32%
• 5Y*: 18.33%
• 10Y*: —

XMTM.TO

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 14.53%
• YTD: 31.92%
• 6M: 26.97%
• 1Y: 39.60%
• 3Y*: 34.59%
• 5Y*: 17.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCIM.NEO vs. XMTM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCIM.NEO Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF	20.61%	37.03%	25.38%	16.54%	-12.40%	10.86%	18.11%
XMTM.TO iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF	31.92%	14.02%	43.59%	6.48%	-14.53%	15.01%	20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FCIM.NEO and XMTM.TO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2020	0.28

The correlation between FCIM.NEO and XMTM.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCIM.NEO vs. XMTM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCIM.NEO

FCIM.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 70
FCIM.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FCIM.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FCIM.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FCIM.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FCIM.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

XMTM.TO

XMTM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 65
XMTM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XMTM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
XMTM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 65
XMTM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
XMTM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCIM.NEO vs. XMTM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCIM.NEO	XMTM.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.14	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	3.00	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.38	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	3.48	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.01	9.97	+2.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCIM.NEO vs. XMTM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCIM.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the XMTM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCIM.NEO and XMTM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCIM.NEO	XMTM.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	2.14	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.10	0.94	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.14	0.87	+0.26

Drawdowns

FCIM.NEO vs. XMTM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCIM.NEO drawdown since its inception was -26.89%, smaller than the maximum XMTM.TO drawdown of -29.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIM.NEO and XMTM.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCIM.NEO	XMTM.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.89%	-29.01%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.21%	-11.42%	-1.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.21%	-20.64%	+7.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.89%	-29.01%	+2.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-1.10%	+0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-7.96%	+2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	3.99%	-0.76%

Volatility

FCIM.NEO vs. XMTM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM.NEO) is 6.67%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM.TO) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that FCIM.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMTM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCIM.NEO	XMTM.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.67%	7.83%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.97%	16.08%	-2.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.65%	18.60%	-1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.82%	18.80%	-1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.45%	20.07%	-3.62%

FCIM.NEO vs. XMTM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCIM.NEO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XMTM.TO's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCIM.NEO vs. XMTM.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCIM.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than XMTM.TO's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCIM.NEO Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF	1.32%	1.59%	1.26%	1.70%	1.86%	2.70%	0.52%	0.00%
XMTM.TO iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF	0.47%	0.70%	0.62%	0.84%	1.66%	0.33%	0.64%	1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCIM.NEO and XMTM.TO in my portfolio?

FCIM.NEO and XMTM.TO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCIM.NEO or XMTM.TO?

On fees, XMTM.TO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCIM.NEO or XMTM.TO?

XMTM.TO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCIM.NEO.

What is the main difference between FCIM.NEO and XMTM.TO?

FCIM.NEO tracks Fidelity Canada International Momentum Index, while XMTM.TO tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCIM.NEO and 0.31% for XMTM.TO.