FCID.TO vs. ZDY.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCID.TO (Fidelity International High Dividend ETF) and ZDY.TO (BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)) are both Dividend funds. FCID.TO is passively managed, while ZDY.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCID.TO returned 13.72%/yr vs 13.55%/yr for ZDY.TO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCID.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZDY.TO.

Performance

FCID.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FCID.TO) and BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCID.TO achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly lower than ZDY.TO's 18.13% return.

FCID.TO

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 10.23%
• 6M: 11.17%
• 1Y: 26.94%
• 3Y*: 20.29%
• 5Y*: 13.72%
• 10Y*: —

ZDY.TO

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 9.13%
• YTD: 18.13%
• 6M: 10.45%
• 1Y: 26.90%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 13.55%
• 10Y*: 11.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCID.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCID.TO Fidelity International High Dividend ETF	10.23%	30.48%	9.16%	15.21%	4.07%	14.85%	-12.90%	5.84%	-2.48%
ZDY.TO BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)	18.13%	4.45%	26.22%	4.58%	1.64%	22.92%	-5.18%	16.96%	-6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FCID.TO and ZDY.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2018	0.49

The correlation between FCID.TO and ZDY.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (5 years) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCID.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCID.TO	ZDY.TO
Financial Services	31.8%	9.5%
Energy	14.0%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	5.4%
Industrials	13.2%	4.4%
Basic Materials	12.9%	1.6%
Real Estate	9.3%	5.6%
Healthcare	3.7%	11.9%
Technology	1.6%	29.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	9.5%
Communication Services	-	6.9%
Utilities	-	6.4%

Return for Risk

FCID.TO vs. ZDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCID.TO

FCID.TO Risk / Return Rank: 64
FCID.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FCID.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FCID.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FCID.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FCID.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 66

ZDY.TO

ZDY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 71
ZDY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ZDY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
ZDY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ZDY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ZDY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCID.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FCID.TO) and BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCID.TO	ZDY.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.28	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	2.97	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.44	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	3.98	-0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.10	13.78	-1.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCID.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCID.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the ZDY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCID.TO and ZDY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCID.TO	ZDY.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	2.28	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.05	1.12	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.95	-0.41

Drawdowns

FCID.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCID.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, roughly equal to the maximum ZDY.TO drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCID.TO and ZDY.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCID.TO	ZDY.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.49%	-33.01%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-6.78%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.86%	-15.32%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.68%	-15.32%	-4.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-0.19%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-3.30%	-2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	1.96%	+0.27%

Volatility

FCID.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FCID.TO) is 3.93%, while BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that FCID.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZDY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCID.TO	ZDY.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	4.73%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.44%	9.85%	+0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.65%	11.85%	+0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.13%	12.17%	+0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.74%	15.18%	+1.56%

FCID.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCID.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDY.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCID.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Dividend Comparison

FCID.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than ZDY.TO's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCID.TO Fidelity International High Dividend ETF	3.39%	3.61%	4.16%	4.49%	5.08%	3.30%	3.78%	3.82%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZDY.TO BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)	1.46%	1.72%	1.97%	2.43%	2.48%	2.33%	3.65%	3.02%	2.80%	2.63%	2.46%	2.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCID.TO and ZDY.TO in my portfolio?

FCID.TO and ZDY.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FCID.TO or ZDY.TO?

On fees, ZDY.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCID.TO or ZDY.TO?

ZDY.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCID.TO.

What is the main difference between FCID.TO and ZDY.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCID.TO and 0.30% for ZDY.TO.