FCID.TO vs. LLYH.TO
FCID.TO (Fidelity International High Dividend ETF) and LLYH.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) are both Dividend funds. FCID.TO is passively managed, while LLYH.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, FCID.TO returned 26.94% vs 39.69% for LLYH.TO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCID.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LLYH.TO.
Performance
FCID.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCID.TO achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly higher than LLYH.TO's 3.76% return.
FCID.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- 1Y
- 26.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
LLYH.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCID.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FCID.TO Fidelity International High Dividend ETF | 10.23% | 30.48% | -1.73% |
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 3.76% | 24.63% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCID.TO and LLYH.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCID.TO vs. LLYH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCID.TO
LLYH.TO
FCID.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FCID.TO) and Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCID.TO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.25 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 1.90 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.10 | 5.21 | +6.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCID.TO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 1.21 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.24 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
FCID.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCID.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, which is greater than LLYH.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCID.TO and LLYH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCID.TO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -31.00% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -20.97% | +12.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -2.39% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -10.18% | +4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 7.64% | -5.41% |
Volatility
FCID.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FCID.TO) is 3.93%, while Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that FCID.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLYH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCID.TO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 6.85% | -2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.44% | 24.78% | -14.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.65% | 33.04% | -20.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.13% | 33.82% | -20.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 33.82% | -17.08% |
FCID.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCID.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LLYH.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCID.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCID.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than LLYH.TO's 17.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCID.TO Fidelity International High Dividend ETF | 3.39% | 3.61% | 4.16% | 4.49% | 5.08% | 3.30% | 3.78% | 3.82% | 0.44% |
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 17.81% | 17.54% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCID.TO and LLYH.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LLYH.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LLYH.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCID.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FCID.TO and 0.40% for LLYH.TO.
Find the right allocation for FCID.TO and LLYH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer