FCHKX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FCHKX (Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FCHKX is a China Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FCHKX returned 12.48%/yr vs 20.78%/yr for FBGRX. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FCHKX charges 1.96%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FCHKX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCHKX achieves a 27.32% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 11.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FCHKX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 12.48%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.78% annualized return.

FCHKX

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -3.21%
• 6M: 14.89%
• YTD: 27.32%
• 1Y: 53.88%
• 3Y*: 27.00%
• 5Y*: 8.21%
• 10Y*: 12.48%
• ALL TIME*: 5.44%

FBGRX

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: -3.22%
• 6M: 10.82%
• YTD: 11.25%
• 1Y: 25.42%
• 3Y*: 25.85%
• 5Y*: 13.72%
• 10Y*: 20.78%
• ALL TIME*: 13.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FCHKX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FCHKX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCHKX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C	27.32%	41.13%	21.90%	-1.27%	-24.66%	-14.60%	46.29%	33.74%	-18.29%	50.37%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	11.25%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FCHKX and FBGRX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2008	0.63

The correlation between FCHKX and FBGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (5 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCHKX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCHKX

FCHKX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FCHKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FCHKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FCHKX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FCHKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FCHKX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCHKX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCHKX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.12	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	1.62	+1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.20	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.19	1.78	+2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.82	6.32	+5.50

FCHKX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCHKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCHKX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCHKX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCHKX drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, roughly equal to the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCHKX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCHKX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.14%	-58.64%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.38%	-12.65%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.42%	-27.07%	+4.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.78%	-43.08%	-5.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.14%	-43.08%	-16.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.60%	-6.87%	-1.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.19%	-12.49%	-8.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.38%	3.56%	+0.82%

Volatility

FCHKX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C (FCHKX) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 6.63%. This indicates that FCHKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCHKX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.92%	6.63%	+2.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.85%	16.11%	+4.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.81%	20.07%	+4.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.70%	25.24%	-0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.66%	23.83%	-1.17%

FCHKX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCHKX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCHKX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FCHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than FBGRX's 1.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.71%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FCHKX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class C	0.69%	0.88%	0.63%	0.63%	0.00%	11.31%	4.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCHKX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FCHKX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCHKX or FBGRX?

FCHKX has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to FBGRX (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCHKX dropped -59.14% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCHKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.