PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCGEX vs. GLIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCGEX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fiera Capital Global Equity Fund (FCGEX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCGEX achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than GLIFX's 8.47% return.


FCGEX

1D
1.40%
1M
1.87%
YTD
6.72%
6M
7.09%
1Y
21.77%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*

GLIFX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
8.47%
6M
9.37%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
13.94%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCGEX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCGEX
Fiera Capital Global Equity Fund
6.72%14.88%10.62%18.80%-18.68%25.48%18.80%33.58%-4.16%15.62%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
8.47%23.85%6.71%10.89%-1.33%19.91%-4.51%22.27%-3.82%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FCGEX and GLIFX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between FCGEX and GLIFX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCGEX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCGEX
FCGEX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FCGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GLIFX
GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCGEX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiera Capital Global Equity Fund (FCGEX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCGEXGLIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.94

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

6.14

+1.32

FCGEX vs. GLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCGEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the GLIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCGEX and GLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCGEX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCGEX drawdown since its inception was -31.87%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGEX and GLIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCGEXGLIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.87%

-29.65%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.29%

-9.00%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

-10.02%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.30%

-17.15%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-4.79%

+4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-3.36%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

2.84%

-0.07%

Volatility

FCGEX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison

Fiera Capital Global Equity Fund (FCGEX) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) at 2.81%. This indicates that FCGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCGEXGLIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

2.81%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

9.39%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

10.79%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.49%

11.00%

+4.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

13.31%

+3.74%

FCGEX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCGEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCGEX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison

FCGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.99%, more than GLIFX's 7.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCGEX
Fiera Capital Global Equity Fund
7.99%8.52%6.38%0.40%5.67%3.20%0.51%3.69%0.89%0.10%0.00%0.00%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.24%6.22%4.26%2.95%14.81%6.21%2.59%4.44%14.29%6.94%1.91%11.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCGEX and GLIFX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCGEX has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to GLIFX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCGEX dropped -31.87% vs GLIFX's -29.65%.

FCGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCGEX and GLIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer