PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCG vs. XLEI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCG vs. XLEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCG vs. XLEI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCG achieves a 31.44% return, which is significantly higher than XLEI's 20.48% return.


FCG

1D
-3.34%
1M
7.40%
YTD
31.44%
6M
29.47%
1Y
25.85%
3Y*
13.93%
5Y*
21.20%
10Y*
6.95%

XLEI

1D
-0.66%
1M
6.43%
YTD
20.48%
6M
24.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCG vs. XLEI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLEI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FCG vs. XLEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCG
FCG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XLEI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCG vs. XLEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCGXLEIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.25

FCG vs. XLEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCGXLEIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

4.03

-4.13

Correlation

The correlation between FCG and XLEI is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FCG vs. XLEI - Dividend Comparison

FCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than XLEI's 11.17% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
2.09%2.86%2.76%3.25%3.04%1.73%3.82%2.87%1.46%1.56%1.70%4.79%
XLEI
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.17%10.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCG vs. XLEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCG drawdown since its inception was -97.20%, which is greater than XLEI's maximum drawdown of -5.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCG and XLEI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCGXLEIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.20%

-5.31%

-91.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.50%

-0.92%

-72.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.30%

-0.93%

-64.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.14%

Volatility

FCG vs. XLEI - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCGXLEIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.59%

11.43%

+21.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.84%

11.43%

+22.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.29%

11.43%

+26.86%