XLEI vs. OIH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XLEI (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and OIH (VanEck Oil Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - XLEI tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector while OIH tracks the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XLEI returned 35.36% vs 66.58% for OIH. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

XLEI vs. OIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLEI achieves a 24.56% return, which is significantly lower than OIH's 35.13% return.

XLEI

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 10.90%
• 6M: 15.89%
• YTD: 24.56%
• 1Y: 35.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 32.17%

OIH

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: 7.01%
• 6M: 10.45%
• YTD: 35.13%
• 1Y: 66.58%
• 3Y*: 5.85%
• 5Y*: 16.72%
• 10Y*: -1.73%
• ALL TIME*: -0.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF	$98.54M	$112.94M	$141.52M
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$1.55M	$1.39M	$1.31M

XLEI vs. OIH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	24.56%	6.17%
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF	35.13%	13.34%

Correlation

The correlation between XLEI and OIH is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.69

The correlation between XLEI and OIH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLEI vs. OIH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLEI	OIH
Financial Services	102.5%	-
Energy	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

XLEI vs. OIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLEI

XLEI Risk / Return Rank: 89
XLEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
XLEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
XLEI Omega Ratio Rank: 89
XLEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
XLEI Martin Ratio Rank: 86

OIH

OIH Risk / Return Rank: 80
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 79
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLEI vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLEI	OIH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.06	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	2.68	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.33	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.11	2.93	+1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.37	9.02	+3.35

XLEI vs. OIH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLEI Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the OIH Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLEI and OIH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLEI vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLEI drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum OIH drawdown of -94.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLEI and OIH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLEI	OIH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.19%	-94.45%	+86.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.19%	-20.78%	+12.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-43.80%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.80%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-65.73%	+65.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-48.94%	+47.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	6.76%	-4.02%

Volatility

XLEI vs. OIH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI) is 3.96%, while VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that XLEI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLEI	OIH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	7.91%	-3.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.26%	20.95%	-9.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.03%	29.63%	-15.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.02%	36.46%	-22.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.02%	42.30%	-28.28%

XLEI vs. OIH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLEI and OIH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

XLEI vs. OIH - Dividend Comparison

XLEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.37%, more than OIH's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF	1.27%	1.71%	2.01%	1.36%	0.95%	0.98%	1.23%	2.10%	2.13%	2.60%	1.40%	2.39%
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	18.37%	10.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLEI and OIH in my portfolio?

XLEI and OIH have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLEI or OIH?

OIH has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to XLEI (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLEI dropped -8.19% vs OIH's -94.45%.

Which ETF is better, XLEI or OIH?

On 1-year performance, OIH leads with 66.58% vs 35.36% for XLEI. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, XLEI has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLEI or OIH?

Over the 1-year period, OIH has performed better with a 66.58% return vs 35.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLEI or OIH?

XLEI and OIH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLEI or OIH?

XLEI has the higher dividend yield at 18.37%, compared with 1.27% for OIH.

What is the main difference between XLEI and OIH?

XLEI tracks S&P Energy Select Sector, while OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.