PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCG vs. TEXU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCG vs. TEXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and Direxion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TEXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCG achieves a 25.55% return, which is significantly lower than TEXU's 57.63% return.


FCG

1D
-0.89%
1M
10.02%
6M
18.75%
YTD
25.55%
1Y
30.04%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
19.99%
10Y*
4.37%
ALL TIME*
-4.48%

TEXU

1D
-2.42%
1M
18.00%
6M
30.06%
YTD
57.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.29M$18.94M$23.89M
$73.06K$89.46K$93.15K

FCG vs. TEXU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
25.55%0.34%
TEXU
Direxion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETF
57.63%-1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FCG and TEXU is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCG vs. TEXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCG
FCG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

TEXU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCG vs. TEXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and Direxion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TEXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCGTEXUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.84

FCG vs. TEXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCG vs. TEXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCG drawdown since its inception was -97.20%, which is greater than TEXU's maximum drawdown of -31.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCG and TEXU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCGTEXUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.20%

-31.71%

-65.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.69%

-17.99%

-56.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.45%

-8.71%

-56.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.85%

Volatility

FCG vs. TEXU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCGTEXUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.35%

40.88%

-13.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.06%

40.88%

-7.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.24%

40.88%

-2.64%

FCG vs. TEXU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TEXU's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCG vs. TEXU - Dividend Comparison

FCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than TEXU's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
2.19%2.86%2.76%3.25%3.04%1.73%3.82%2.87%1.46%1.56%1.70%4.79%
TEXU
Direxion Daily Energy Top 5 Bull 2X ETF
1.40%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCG and TEXU have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FCG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TEXU.

FCG has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.40% for TEXU.

FCG is categorized as Energy Equities, while TEXU is Leveraged Equities. FCG tracks Nasdaq FactSet Natural Gas Index, while TEXU tracks S&P 500 Energy (Sector) Top 5 Equal Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FCG and 0.98% for TEXU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCG and TEXU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer