PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCG vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCG vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCG achieves a 27.71% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FCG has underperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 4.65%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.13% annualized return.


FCG

1D
1.02%
1M
-6.03%
YTD
27.71%
6M
20.12%
1Y
32.99%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
16.52%
10Y*
4.65%

NFTY

1D
-1.34%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
-9.70%
6M
-7.99%
1Y
-8.48%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCG vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
27.71%-2.28%4.16%2.55%47.24%98.49%-23.20%-15.76%-34.81%-11.38%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-9.70%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FCG and NFTY is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2012

0.17

The correlation between FCG and NFTY shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.18 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCG vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCG
NFTY

Energy

99.2%
8.5%

Technology

0.8%
9.2%

Basic Materials

-

12.5%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

16.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.3%

Financial Services

-

21.2%

Healthcare

-

9.7%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

4.0%

Energy

FCG
99.2%
NFTY
8.5%

Technology

FCG
0.8%
NFTY
9.2%

Basic Materials

FCG

-

NFTY
12.5%

Communication Services

FCG

-

NFTY
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FCG

-

NFTY
16.3%

Consumer Defensive

FCG

-

NFTY
8.3%

Financial Services

FCG

-

NFTY
21.2%

Healthcare

FCG

-

NFTY
9.7%

Industrials

FCG

-

NFTY
8.3%

Real Estate

FCG

-

NFTY

-

Utilities

FCG

-

NFTY
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCG vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCG
FCG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCG vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCGNFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.91

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

-0.53

+3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.56

-1.39

+6.95

FCG vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCG and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCGNFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

-0.58

+1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.27

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.39

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.28

-0.39

Drawdowns

FCG vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCG drawdown since its inception was -97.20%, which is greater than NFTY's maximum drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCG and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCGNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.20%

-47.67%

-49.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-16.14%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.44%

-21.55%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.33%

-21.55%

-11.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.04%

-47.67%

-37.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.25%

-17.45%

-56.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.38%

-9.58%

-55.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.95%

6.12%

-0.17%

Volatility

FCG vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 4.58%. This indicates that FCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCGNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.60%

4.58%

+5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.15%

12.57%

+7.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.75%

14.72%

+12.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.46%

17.39%

+16.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.30%

20.72%

+17.58%

FCG vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCG vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

FCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than NFTY's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
2.15%2.86%2.76%3.25%3.04%1.73%3.82%2.87%1.46%1.56%1.70%4.79%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.96%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCG and NFTY have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCG has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to NFTY (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCG dropped -97.20% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 10-year performance, NFTY leads with 8.13% vs 4.65% for FCG. On fees, FCG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NFTY has performed better with a 8.13% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.

FCG has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.96% for NFTY.

FCG is categorized as Energy Equities, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. FCG tracks ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FCG and 0.80% for NFTY.

FCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCG and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer