FCG vs. CRAK
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK).
FCG and CRAK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCG is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007. CRAK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Oil Refiners. It was launched on Aug 18, 2015. Both FCG and CRAK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FCG vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCG vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF | 35.99% | -2.28% | 4.16% | 2.55% | 47.24% | 98.49% | -23.20% | -15.76% | -34.81% | -11.38% |
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 31.71% | 39.11% | -15.05% | 13.73% | 19.10% | 10.90% | -11.22% | 9.15% | -10.46% | 49.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCG achieves a 35.99% return, which is significantly higher than CRAK's 31.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FCG has underperformed CRAK with an annualized return of 7.31%, while CRAK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.53% annualized return.
FCG
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- 13.98%
- YTD
- 35.99%
- 6M
- 36.46%
- 1Y
- 30.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 22.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
CRAK
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 10.12%
- YTD
- 31.71%
- 6M
- 37.36%
- 1Y
- 75.35%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCG vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FCG and CRAK have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
FCG vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank
FCG
CRAK
FCG vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCG | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 3.63 | -2.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 4.38 | -3.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.66 | -0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 4.91 | -3.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.92 | 21.23 | -17.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCG | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 3.63 | -2.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.79 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.57 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.54 | -0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCG and CRAK is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCG vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison
FCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than CRAK's 1.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF | 2.02% | 2.86% | 2.76% | 3.25% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 3.82% | 2.87% | 1.46% | 1.56% | 1.70% | 4.79% |
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 1.53% | 2.02% | 5.60% | 3.65% | 3.08% | 2.40% | 2.64% | 1.49% | 2.42% | 1.66% | 3.42% | 0.47% |
Drawdowns
FCG vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCG drawdown since its inception was -97.20%, which is greater than CRAK's maximum drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCG and CRAK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCG | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.20% | -58.80% | -38.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -15.07% | -8.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.33% | -35.61% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.04% | -58.80% | -26.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.58% | 0.00% | -72.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.30% | -12.64% | -52.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.13% | 3.49% | +4.64% |
Volatility
FCG vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 5.52%. This indicates that FCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCG | CRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 5.52% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.28% | 13.47% | +4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.42% | 20.89% | +11.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 20.44% | +13.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.28% | 22.10% | +16.18% |