PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCFCX vs. FRQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCFCX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C (FCFCX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFCX achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly higher than FRQIX's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFCX has underperformed FRQIX with an annualized return of 4.72%, while FRQIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.98% annualized return.


FCFCX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.72%
YTD
4.64%
6M
4.90%
1Y
11.02%
3Y*
7.81%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
4.72%

FRQIX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.53%
YTD
4.05%
6M
4.28%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
4.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFCX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCFCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C
4.64%10.08%4.12%8.46%-13.98%4.41%9.71%13.61%-4.20%11.06%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
4.05%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.58%12.63%-2.84%10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFCX and FRQIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.98

The correlation between FCFCX and FRQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCFCX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFCX
FCFCX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FCFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FCFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQIX
FRQIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FRQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFCX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C (FCFCX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCFCXFRQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.51

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.07

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

13.08

-1.61

FCFCX vs. FRQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the FRQIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFCX and FRQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCFCXFRQIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.53

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.53

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.94

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.56

-0.10

Drawdowns

FCFCX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFCX drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, roughly equal to the maximum FRQIX drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFCX and FRQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCFCXFRQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.93%

-38.01%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.09%

-3.43%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.96%

-5.21%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.13%

-17.04%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.13%

-17.04%

-2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-4.43%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.80%

+0.16%

Volatility

FCFCX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C (FCFCX) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) at 1.66%. This indicates that FCFCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCFCXFRQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

1.66%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.17%

3.42%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96%

4.15%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

5.57%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.32%

5.33%

+0.99%

FCFCX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFCX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCFCX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison

FCFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than FRQIX's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCFCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class C
4.14%4.17%2.05%1.54%6.13%8.15%5.00%4.97%8.11%5.67%3.85%3.78%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.04%3.14%2.97%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.51%3.14%5.60%16.32%2.43%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FCFCX and FRQIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCFCX has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to FRQIX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFCX dropped -38.93% vs FRQIX's -38.01%.

FRQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCFCX and FRQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer