FCFBX vs. FANCX
FCFBX (Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares) and FANCX (Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C) are both Total Bond Market funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FCFBX returned 3.41%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for FANCX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCFBX charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for FANCX.
Performance
FCFBX vs. FANCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCFBX achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than FANCX's 0.11% return.
FCFBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 6.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- —
FANCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 2.26%
- 3Y*
- 3.68%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- —
FCFBX vs. FANCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFBX Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares | 1.48% | 4.16% | 7.90% | 11.35% | -7.84% | 5.07% | 6.12% | 6.88% | -0.18% |
FANCX Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C | 0.11% | 4.38% | 3.74% | 3.91% | -4.63% | -1.81% | 2.74% | 2.90% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCFBX and FANCX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2018 | 0.57 |
The correlation between FCFBX and FANCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCFBX vs. FANCX — Risk / Return Rank
FCFBX
FANCX
FCFBX vs. FANCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares (FCFBX) and Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCFBX | FANCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 1.93 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.73 | 5.72 | +3.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCFBX vs. FANCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCFBX drawdown since its inception was -16.34%, which is greater than FANCX's maximum drawdown of -7.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFBX and FANCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCFBX | FANCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.34% | -7.79% | -8.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.71% | -1.18% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.27% | -1.18% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.77% | -7.24% | -3.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.46% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -1.54% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.46% | 0.40% | +0.06% |
Volatility
FCFBX vs. FANCX - Volatility Comparison
Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares (FCFBX) and Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C (FANCX) have volatilities of 0.62% and 0.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCFBX | FANCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 0.64% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.73% | 1.36% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19% | 1.81% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.84% | 2.14% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 1.77% | +1.75% |
FCFBX vs. FANCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCFBX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FANCX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCFBX vs. FANCX - Dividend Comparison
FCFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than FANCX's 3.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANCX Fidelity Advisor Short-Term Bond Fund Class C | 3.09% | 3.20% | 2.95% | 1.75% | 0.15% | 0.36% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 0.69% | 0.21% | 0.07% |
FCFBX Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares | 6.28% | 5.09% | 5.76% | 5.93% | 5.00% | 3.65% | 3.70% | 4.55% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCFBX and FANCX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FANCX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to FCFBX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFBX dropped -16.34% vs FANCX's -7.79%.
FCFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCFBX and FANCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer