FCFBX vs. FADMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCFBX (Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares) and FADMX (Fidelity Strategic Income Fund) are both Total Bond Market funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FCFBX returned 3.62%/yr vs 3.32%/yr for FADMX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCFBX charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FADMX.

Performance

FCFBX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares (FCFBX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFBX achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than FADMX's 3.29% return.

FCFBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 5.11%
• 3Y*: 6.87%
• 5Y*: 3.62%
• 10Y*: —

FADMX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 3.29%
• 6M: 3.71%
• 1Y: 9.92%
• 3Y*: 8.21%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFBX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCFBX Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares	1.47%	4.16%	7.90%	11.35%	-7.84%	5.07%	6.12%	6.88%	-0.18%
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund	3.29%	9.01%	6.02%	9.55%	-11.84%	3.46%	6.72%	11.06%	-1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFBX and FADMX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2018	0.68

The correlation between FCFBX and FADMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCFBX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFBX

FCFBX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FCFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FCFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FCFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FCFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FCFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FADMX

FADMX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FADMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FADMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FADMX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FADMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FADMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFBX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares (FCFBX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCFBX	FADMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.93	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.61	4.43	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.62	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	3.91	-0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.28	17.16	-5.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCFBX vs. FADMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the FADMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFBX and FADMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCFBX	FADMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.93	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.29	0.74	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.86	+0.34

Drawdowns

FCFBX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFBX drawdown since its inception was -16.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FADMX drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFBX and FADMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCFBX	FADMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.34%	-15.98%	-0.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.71%	-2.62%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.27%	-3.99%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.77%	-15.98%	+5.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.81%	-3.07%	+1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	0.60%	-0.15%

Volatility

FCFBX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares (FCFBX) is 0.81%, while Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that FCFBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FADMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCFBX	FADMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.81%	1.35%	-0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.62%	2.90%	-1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21%	3.50%	-1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.82%	4.51%	-1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.53%	4.77%	-1.24%

FCFBX vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFBX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FADMX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCFBX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison

FCFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, more than FADMX's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund	4.28%	4.33%	4.16%	4.31%	2.91%	4.23%	3.82%	4.34%	2.74%
FCFBX Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares	6.16%	5.09%	5.76%	5.93%	5.00%	3.65%	3.70%	4.55%	3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCFBX and FADMX in my portfolio?

FCFBX and FADMX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCFBX or FADMX?

FADMX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to FCFBX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFBX dropped -16.34% vs FADMX's -15.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FADMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.