FCFBX vs. FNILX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares (FCFBX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX).

FCFBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 3, 2012. FNILX is managed by Fidelity.

Performance

FCFBX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares (FCFBX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FCFBX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCFBX Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares	-0.70%	4.16%	7.90%	11.35%	-7.84%	5.07%	6.12%	6.88%	-1.05%
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund	-7.30%	17.81%	25.47%	27.45%	-19.37%	26.67%	21.13%	31.79%	-13.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFBX achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly higher than FNILX's -7.30% return.

FCFBX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -2.03%
• YTD: -0.70%
• 6M: -0.66%
• 1Y: 3.05%
• 3Y*: 6.54%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: —

FNILX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -7.60%
• YTD: -7.30%
• 6M: -5.00%
• 1Y: 14.41%
• 3Y*: 17.43%
• 5Y*: 11.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFBX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFBX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.

FCFBX

Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares

FNILX

Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund

Return for Risk

FCFBX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFBX

FCFBX Risk / Return Rank: 58
FCFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FCFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FCFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FCFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FCFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FNILX

FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 45
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFBX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares (FCFBX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCFBX	FNILX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	0.83	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	1.28	+0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.20	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	1.04	+0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.65	5.01	-0.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCFBX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFBX and FNILX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCFBX	FNILX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	0.83	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.24	0.65	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.14	0.64	+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between FCFBX and FNILX is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FCFBX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FCFBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, more than FNILX's 1.09% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCFBX Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares	5.62%	5.09%	5.76%	5.93%	5.00%	3.65%	3.70%	4.55%	3.10%
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund	1.09%	1.01%	1.09%	1.34%	1.53%	0.95%	1.20%	1.17%	0.53%

Drawdowns

FCFBX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFBX drawdown since its inception was -16.34%, smaller than the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFBX and FNILX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCFBX	FNILX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.34%	-33.76%	+17.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.24%	-12.18%	+9.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.77%	-25.40%	+14.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.03%	-9.01%	+6.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-5.47%	+3.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.59%	2.54%	-1.95%

Volatility

FCFBX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frost Credit Fund A Class Shares (FCFBX) is 0.95%, while Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that FCFBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCFBX	FNILX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.95%	4.23%	-3.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.43%	9.14%	-7.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65%	18.26%	-15.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.80%	17.22%	-14.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.55%	20.17%	-16.62%