FCFAX vs. XLI
FCFAX (Frost Credit Fund) and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both funds - FCFAX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Frost Funds, while XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, FCFAX returned 5.17%/yr vs 14.15%/yr for XLI. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCFAX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLI.
Performance
FCFAX vs. XLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCFAX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than XLI's 13.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFAX has underperformed XLI with an annualized return of 5.17%, while XLI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.15% annualized return.
FCFAX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
XLI
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
FCFAX vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | 1.58% | 5.21% | 8.01% | 11.23% | -7.83% | 5.07% | 6.22% | 6.95% | 0.89% | 7.95% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.90% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCFAX and XLI is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.15 |
The correlation between FCFAX and XLI shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCFAX vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank
FCFAX
XLI
FCFAX vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCFAX | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.26 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 1.98 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.89 | 7.82 | +2.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCFAX vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCFAX drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, smaller than the maximum XLI drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFAX and XLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCFAX | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.33% | -62.26% | +45.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.82% | -12.21% | +10.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.82% | -18.49% | +15.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.49% | -21.64% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.33% | -42.33% | +26.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.24% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -9.20% | +7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.49% | 3.09% | -2.60% |
Volatility
FCFAX vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) is 0.77%, while Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that FCFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCFAX | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 6.22% | -5.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.76% | 13.59% | -11.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27% | 16.17% | -13.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.77% | 17.55% | -14.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.24% | 20.04% | -16.80% |
FCFAX vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCFAX vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison
FCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, more than XLI's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | 6.15% | 6.10% | 5.76% | 5.93% | 5.00% | 3.65% | 3.69% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 5.85% | 4.84% | 4.95% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCFAX and XLI have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLI has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to FCFAX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFAX dropped -16.33% vs XLI's -62.26%.
FCFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCFAX and XLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer