PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCFAX vs. VISTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund (VISTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with FCFAX at 1.27% and VISTX at 1.27%. Over the past 10 years, FCFAX has outperformed VISTX with an annualized return of 4.70%, while VISTX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.46% annualized return.


FCFAX

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.43%
6M
0.59%
YTD
1.27%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
6.60%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
4.70%
ALL TIME*
4.37%

VISTX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.16%
6M
0.98%
YTD
1.27%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
2.57%
10Y*
2.46%
ALL TIME*
2.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
1.27%5.21%8.01%11.23%-7.83%5.07%6.22%6.95%0.89%7.95%
VISTX
Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund
1.27%5.68%5.56%4.98%-3.73%-0.04%3.92%4.20%1.83%1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFAX and VISTX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.53

The correlation between FCFAX and VISTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCFAX vs. VISTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCFAX
FCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VISTX
VISTX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VISTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VISTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VISTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
VISTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VISTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund (VISTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCFAXVISTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.57

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.97

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

16.43

-10.43

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the VISTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFAX and VISTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFAX drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, which is greater than VISTX's maximum drawdown of -5.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFAX and VISTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCFAXVISTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.33%

-5.64%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.82%

-0.86%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.82%

-0.86%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.49%

-5.64%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.33%

-5.64%

-10.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

0.00%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

-0.68%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.21%

+0.31%

Volatility

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Volatility Comparison

Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) has a higher volatility of 0.68% compared to Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund (VISTX) at 0.38%. This indicates that FCFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VISTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCFAXVISTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

0.38%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.82%

1.00%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

1.26%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

1.88%

+0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.20%

1.48%

+1.72%

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than VISTX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Dividend Comparison

FCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than VISTX's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
6.33%6.10%5.76%5.93%5.00%3.65%3.69%4.62%5.05%5.85%4.84%4.95%
VISTX
Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund
4.45%4.53%5.03%3.91%1.76%1.85%2.33%2.72%2.32%1.78%1.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCFAX and VISTX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCFAX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to VISTX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFAX dropped -16.33% vs VISTX's -5.64%.

VISTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCFAX and VISTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer