PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCFAX vs. VISTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund (VISTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFAX achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than VISTX's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFAX has outperformed VISTX with an annualized return of 5.21%, while VISTX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.


FCFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.72%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.23%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
5.21%

VISTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.12%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
1.47%5.21%8.01%11.23%-7.83%5.07%6.22%6.95%0.89%7.95%
VISTX
Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund
0.81%5.68%5.56%4.98%-3.73%-0.04%3.92%4.20%1.83%1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFAX and VISTX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.52

The correlation between FCFAX and VISTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCFAX vs. VISTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFAX
FCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VISTX
VISTX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VISTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VISTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VISTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VISTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VISTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund (VISTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCFAXVISTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.75

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

5.00

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.81

20.81

-10.00

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the VISTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFAX and VISTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCFAXVISTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

3.25

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.39

1.35

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.61

1.67

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

1.71

-0.26

Drawdowns

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFAX drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, which is greater than VISTX's maximum drawdown of -5.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFAX and VISTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCFAXVISTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.33%

-5.64%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.82%

-0.86%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.82%

-0.86%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.49%

-5.64%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.33%

-5.64%

-10.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.08%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-0.69%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.21%

+0.27%

Volatility

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Volatility Comparison

Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund (VISTX) at 0.39%. This indicates that FCFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VISTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCFAXVISTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.39%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.74%

0.87%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26%

1.33%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.76%

1.87%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.24%

1.47%

+1.77%

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than VISTX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCFAX vs. VISTX - Dividend Comparison

FCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, more than VISTX's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
6.16%6.10%5.76%5.93%5.00%3.65%3.69%4.62%5.05%5.85%4.84%4.95%
VISTX
Vanguard Institutional Short-Term Bond Fund
4.46%4.53%5.03%3.91%1.76%1.85%2.33%2.72%2.32%1.78%1.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCFAX and VISTX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCFAX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to VISTX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFAX dropped -16.33% vs VISTX's -5.64%.

VISTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCFAX and VISTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer