FCFAX vs. STBFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCFAX (Frost Credit Fund) and STBFX (Sextant Short Term Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCFAX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for STBFX.

Performance

FCFAX vs. STBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Sextant Short Term Bond Fund (STBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FCFAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 7.27%
• 5Y*: 3.83%
• 10Y*: 5.21%

STBFX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFAX vs. STBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund	1.47%	5.21%	8.01%	11.23%	-7.83%	5.07%	6.22%	6.95%	0.89%	7.95%
STBFX Sextant Short Term Bond Fund	0.28%	4.92%	3.87%	3.79%	-4.16%	-1.09%	3.42%	4.03%	1.09%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFAX and STBFX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.34

The correlation between FCFAX and STBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCFAX vs. STBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFAX

FCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 63
FCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFAX vs. STBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Sextant Short Term Bond Fund (STBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCFAX	STBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.81	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCFAX	STBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FCFAX	STBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FCFAX	STBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.74%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.76%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.24%	—	—

FCFAX vs. STBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than STBFX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCFAX vs. STBFX - Dividend Comparison

FCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, more than STBFX's 2.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund	6.16%	6.10%	5.76%	5.93%	5.00%	3.65%	3.69%	4.62%	5.05%	5.85%	4.84%	4.95%
STBFX Sextant Short Term Bond Fund	2.61%	3.17%	2.77%	1.84%	1.04%	1.07%	1.60%	1.75%	1.47%	1.30%	1.06%	1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCFAX and STBFX in my portfolio?

FCFAX and STBFX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.