FCFAX vs. FUMBX
FCFAX (Frost Credit Fund) and FUMBX (Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, FCFAX returned 3.52%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for FUMBX. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FCFAX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FUMBX.
Performance
FCFAX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCFAX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than FUMBX's 0.33% return.
FCFAX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 2.99%
- 3Y*
- 6.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 4.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.37%
FUMBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- 1.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FCFAX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | 1.27% | 5.21% | 8.01% | 11.23% | -7.83% | 5.07% | 6.22% | 6.95% | 0.89% | 0.92% |
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 0.33% | 5.83% | 3.25% | 4.47% | -5.84% | -1.38% | 4.22% | 4.19% | 1.47% | -0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCFAX and FUMBX is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017 | 0.55 |
The correlation between FCFAX and FUMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCFAX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank
FCFAX
FUMBX
FCFAX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCFAX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.41 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 3.79 | +2.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCFAX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCFAX drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, which is greater than FUMBX's maximum drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFAX and FUMBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCFAX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.33% | -8.83% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.82% | -1.54% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.82% | -1.57% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.49% | -8.40% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.63% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -1.84% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 0.57% | -0.05% |
Volatility
FCFAX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison
Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) has a higher volatility of 0.68% compared to Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) at 0.55%. This indicates that FCFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCFAX | FUMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 0.55% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.82% | 1.59% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27% | 1.96% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.79% | 2.93% | -0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.20% | 2.48% | +0.72% |
FCFAX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCFAX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison
FCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than FUMBX's 3.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | 6.33% | 6.10% | 5.76% | 5.93% | 5.00% | 3.65% | 3.69% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 5.85% | 4.84% | 4.95% |
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.84% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 1.64% | 0.86% | 1.15% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCFAX and FUMBX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCFAX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to FUMBX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFAX dropped -16.33% vs FUMBX's -8.83%.
FCFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCFAX and FUMBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer