PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCFAX vs. FIJEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCFAX vs. FIJEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Frost Total Return Bond Fund (FIJEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFAX achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than FIJEX's 1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFAX has outperformed FIJEX with an annualized return of 5.21%, while FIJEX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.54% annualized return.


FCFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.72%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.23%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
5.21%

FIJEX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.55%
YTD
1.17%
6M
0.88%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
6.07%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFAX vs. FIJEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
1.47%5.21%8.01%11.23%-7.83%5.07%6.22%6.95%0.89%7.95%
FIJEX
Frost Total Return Bond Fund
1.17%4.83%6.44%8.64%-5.30%3.45%3.49%5.38%1.38%4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFAX and FIJEX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.67

Over the past year, FCFAX and FIJEX have become more correlated (0.88) than their long-term average of 0.67, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCFAX vs. FIJEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFAX
FCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FIJEX
FIJEX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FIJEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIJEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIJEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FIJEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIJEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFAX vs. FIJEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Frost Total Return Bond Fund (FIJEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCFAXFIJEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

1.70

+0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.58

2.51

+1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.31

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

2.35

+0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.81

7.21

+3.60

FCFAX vs. FIJEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the FIJEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFAX and FIJEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCFAXFIJEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.70

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.39

0.93

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.61

1.10

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

0.97

+0.48

Drawdowns

FCFAX vs. FIJEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFAX drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FIJEX drawdown of -16.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFAX and FIJEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCFAXFIJEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.33%

-16.82%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.82%

-2.25%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.82%

-3.40%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.49%

-7.52%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.33%

-11.60%

-4.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.72%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-2.86%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.73%

-0.25%

Volatility

FCFAX vs. FIJEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) is 0.81%, while Frost Total Return Bond Fund (FIJEX) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that FCFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIJEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCFAXFIJEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

1.19%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.74%

2.22%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26%

3.11%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.76%

3.70%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.24%

3.22%

+0.02%

FCFAX vs. FIJEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FIJEX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCFAX vs. FIJEX - Dividend Comparison

FCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, more than FIJEX's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
6.16%6.10%5.76%5.93%5.00%3.65%3.69%4.62%5.05%5.85%4.84%4.95%
FIJEX
Frost Total Return Bond Fund
5.72%4.64%5.23%5.53%4.69%3.31%3.82%3.79%3.63%3.68%4.03%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCFAX and FIJEX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIJEX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to FCFAX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFAX dropped -16.33% vs FIJEX's -16.82%.

FCFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCFAX and FIJEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer