FCFAX vs. FADMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCFAX (Frost Credit Fund) and FADMX (Fidelity Strategic Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FCFAX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Frost Funds, while FADMX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FCFAX returned 3.83%/yr vs 3.32%/yr for FADMX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCFAX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FADMX.

Performance

FCFAX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFAX achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than FADMX's 3.29% return.

FCFAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 7.27%
• 5Y*: 3.83%
• 10Y*: 5.21%

FADMX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 3.29%
• 6M: 3.71%
• 1Y: 9.92%
• 3Y*: 8.21%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFAX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund	1.47%	5.21%	8.01%	11.23%	-7.83%	5.07%	6.22%	6.95%	0.27%
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund	3.29%	9.01%	6.02%	9.55%	-11.84%	3.46%	6.72%	11.06%	-2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFAX and FADMX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2018	0.67

The correlation between FCFAX and FADMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCFAX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFAX

FCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 63
FCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FADMX

FADMX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FADMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FADMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FADMX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FADMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FADMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFAX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCFAX	FADMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.93	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	4.43	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.62	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	3.91	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.81	17.16	-6.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCFAX vs. FADMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FADMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFAX and FADMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCFAX	FADMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	2.93	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.39	0.74	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	0.86	+0.59

Drawdowns

FCFAX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFAX drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FADMX drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFAX and FADMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCFAX	FADMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.33%	-15.98%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.82%	-2.62%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.82%	-3.99%	+1.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.49%	-15.98%	+5.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-3.07%	+1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	0.60%	-0.12%

Volatility

FCFAX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) is 0.81%, while Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that FCFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FADMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCFAX	FADMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.81%	1.35%	-0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.74%	2.90%	-1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26%	3.50%	-1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.76%	4.51%	-1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.24%	4.77%	-1.53%

FCFAX vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FADMX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCFAX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison

FCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, more than FADMX's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund	4.28%	4.33%	4.16%	4.31%	2.91%	4.23%	3.82%	4.34%	2.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund	6.16%	6.10%	5.76%	5.93%	5.00%	3.65%	3.69%	4.62%	5.05%	5.85%	4.84%	4.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCFAX and FADMX in my portfolio?

FCFAX and FADMX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCFAX or FADMX?

FADMX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to FCFAX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFAX dropped -16.33% vs FADMX's -15.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FADMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.