FCENX vs. FISZX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FCENX (Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor) and FISZX (Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FCENX returned 9.13%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for FISZX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.00% expense ratio.

Performance

FCENX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCENX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCENX achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 26.68% return.

FCENX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 9.67%
• 6M: 12.25%
• 1Y: 22.98%
• 3Y*: 19.41%
• 5Y*: 9.13%
• 10Y*: —

FISZX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 5.82%
• YTD: 26.68%
• 6M: 30.45%
• 1Y: 40.73%
• 3Y*: 22.32%
• 5Y*: 8.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCENX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCENX Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	9.67%	32.40%	6.04%	20.70%	-17.25%	14.98%	9.38%	8.79%
FISZX Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund	26.68%	31.77%	3.61%	15.83%	-28.32%	9.91%	23.49%	11.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FCENX and FISZX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.88

The correlation between FCENX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCENX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCENX

FCENX Risk / Return Rank: 31
FCENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FCENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FCENX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FCENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FCENX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

FISZX

FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 57
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCENX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCENX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCENX	FISZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.19	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.99	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.40	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	2.86	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.25	11.28	-4.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCENX vs. FISZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCENX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the FISZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCENX and FISZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCENX	FISZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	2.19	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.49	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.65	+0.03

Drawdowns

FCENX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCENX drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum FISZX drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCENX and FISZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCENX	FISZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.53%	-39.92%	+8.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-14.48%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.45%	-14.63%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.59%	-39.92%	+9.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-0.42%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.25%	-12.36%	+6.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	3.66%	-0.48%

Volatility

FCENX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCENX) is 4.66%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that FCENX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCENX	FISZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	7.71%	-3.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.48%	16.21%	-3.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.18%	18.89%	-3.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.76%	17.84%	-2.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.63%	18.26%	-0.63%

FCENX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCENX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FCENX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison

FCENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.65%, more than FISZX's 1.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCENX Franklin International Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	11.65%	13.50%	5.30%	4.11%	2.75%	8.56%	2.14%	0.83%
FISZX Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund	1.52%	1.92%	2.55%	1.89%	1.37%	6.08%	0.90%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCENX and FISZX in my portfolio?

FCENX and FISZX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCENX or FISZX?

FISZX has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to FCENX (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCENX dropped -31.53% vs FISZX's -39.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.