FCEF vs. THRV
FCEF (First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCEF charges 2.91%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
FCEF vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCEF achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 2.25% return.
FCEF
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 6.40%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.84%
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCEF vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FCEF First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF | 6.40% | 2.19% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 2.25% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCEF and THRV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCEF vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
FCEF
THRV
FCEF vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF (FCEF) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCEF | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.09 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCEF | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.26 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
FCEF vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCEF drawdown since its inception was -44.81%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEF and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCEF | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.81% | -1.50% | -43.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -0.13% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -0.44% | -5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | — | — |
Volatility
FCEF vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCEF | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.75% | 2.89% | +4.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.19% | 2.89% | +9.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 2.89% | +12.53% |
FCEF vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCEF has a 2.91% expense ratio, which is higher than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCEF vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
FCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than THRV's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCEF First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF | 6.86% | 7.05% | 7.13% | 7.17% | 7.26% | 4.74% | 5.03% | 5.07% | 5.96% | 4.90% | 1.51% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.69% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCEF and THRV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, THRV is cheaper at 1.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
THRV is cheaper with a 1.80% expense ratio, compared with 2.91% for FCEF.
FCEF has the higher dividend yield at 6.86%, compared with 4.69% for THRV.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 2.91% for FCEF and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for FCEF and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer