PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCEEX vs. HIEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCEEX vs. HIEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) and Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (HIEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCEEX vs. HIEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
4.40%34.81%10.51%12.52%-16.96%-1.29%10.19%9.77%
HIEMX
Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
-10.74%21.39%-8.26%0.39%-23.26%-6.34%15.71%6.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCEEX achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly higher than HIEMX's -10.74% return.


FCEEX

1D
2.54%
1M
-8.70%
YTD
4.40%
6M
7.60%
1Y
34.25%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*

HIEMX

1D
2.58%
1M
-10.95%
YTD
-10.74%
6M
-10.01%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
-0.50%
5Y*
-7.23%
10Y*
1.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCEEX vs. HIEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCEEX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than HIEMX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FCEEX vs. HIEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCEEX
FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

HIEMX
HIEMX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HIEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
HIEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCEEX vs. HIEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) and Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (HIEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCEEXHIEMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

0.32

+1.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.56

0.55

+2.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.07

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

0.25

+2.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.02

1.01

+9.01

FCEEX vs. HIEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCEEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the HIEMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCEEX and HIEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCEEXHIEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

0.32

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

-0.47

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.25

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between FCEEX and HIEMX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FCEEX vs. HIEMX - Dividend Comparison

FCEEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than HIEMX's 2.11% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
3.15%3.29%4.17%4.36%4.08%3.38%2.98%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HIEMX
Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
2.11%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%23.24%0.63%2.05%3.83%0.70%0.44%0.94%

Drawdowns

FCEEX vs. HIEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCEEX drawdown since its inception was -34.68%, smaller than the maximum HIEMX drawdown of -58.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEEX and HIEMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCEEXHIEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.68%

-58.48%

+23.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.98%

-17.19%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.96%

-41.42%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.77%

-35.86%

+25.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.50%

-17.52%

+6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

4.20%

-0.94%

Volatility

FCEEX vs. HIEMX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) has a higher volatility of 8.67% compared to Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (HIEMX) at 7.17%. This indicates that FCEEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCEEXHIEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.67%

7.17%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

11.20%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

16.12%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

15.34%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

16.09%

+2.09%