HIEMX vs. CEMFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (HIEMX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX).
HIEMX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Oct 19, 1997. CEMFX is managed by Cullen Funds Trust. It was launched on Aug 30, 2012.
Performance
HIEMX vs. CEMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HIEMX vs. CEMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIEMX Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | -12.99% | 21.39% | -8.26% | 0.39% | -23.26% | -6.34% | 15.71% | 18.35% | -14.37% | 34.47% |
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund | 6.79% | 31.39% | 9.51% | 26.45% | -16.15% | 6.74% | 8.70% | 19.75% | -16.90% | 29.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIEMX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than CEMFX's 6.79% return. Over the past 10 years, HIEMX has underperformed CEMFX with an annualized return of 0.87%, while CEMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.57% annualized return.
HIEMX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -14.60%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -12.68%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- -1.34%
- 5Y*
- -7.31%
- 10Y*
- 0.87%
CEMFX
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -11.79%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 38.22%
- 3Y*
- 21.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HIEMX vs. CEMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIEMX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HIEMX vs. CEMFX — Risk / Return Rank
HIEMX
CEMFX
HIEMX vs. CEMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (HIEMX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIEMX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.10 | 2.25 | -2.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.25 | 2.86 | -2.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.43 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 2.87 | -2.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.03 | 10.73 | -10.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIEMX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 2.25 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.48 | 0.76 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 0.64 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.46 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between HIEMX and CEMFX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HIEMX vs. CEMFX - Dividend Comparison
HIEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than CEMFX's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIEMX Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 2.17% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.24% | 0.63% | 2.05% | 3.83% | 0.70% | 0.44% | 0.94% |
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund | 2.03% | 1.72% | 3.31% | 4.68% | 1.26% | 2.62% | 2.13% | 4.16% | 2.26% | 3.59% | 3.65% | 4.60% |
Drawdowns
HIEMX vs. CEMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIEMX drawdown since its inception was -58.48%, which is greater than CEMFX's maximum drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIEMX and CEMFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIEMX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.48% | -39.30% | -19.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.19% | -12.41% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.42% | -28.13% | -13.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.22% | -39.30% | -4.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.47% | -12.41% | -25.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.51% | -9.69% | -7.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.10% | 3.33% | +0.77% |
Volatility
HIEMX vs. CEMFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Vontobel Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (HIEMX) is 6.46%, while Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that HIEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HIEMX | CEMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 6.95% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 12.42% | -1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 16.42% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 14.09% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 14.92% | +1.15% |