FCEEX vs. EMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCEEX (Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor) and EMO (ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund) are both mutual funds - FCEEX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while EMO is a MLPs fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 5 years, FCEEX returned 10.38%/yr vs 26.12%/yr for EMO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCEEX charges 0.17%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for EMO.

Performance

FCEEX vs. EMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCEEX achieves a 30.78% return, which is significantly higher than EMO's 15.80% return.

FCEEX

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 9.92%
• YTD: 30.78%
• 6M: 32.80%
• 1Y: 59.40%
• 3Y*: 28.19%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: —

EMO

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -2.28%
• YTD: 15.80%
• 6M: 14.62%
• 1Y: 20.96%
• 3Y*: 32.17%
• 5Y*: 26.12%
• 10Y*: 6.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCEEX vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	30.78%	34.81%	10.51%	12.52%	-16.96%	-1.29%	10.19%	9.77%
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund	15.80%	7.38%	44.45%	31.76%	40.13%	74.70%	-64.47%	-0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FCEEX and EMO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.34

The correlation between FCEEX and EMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCEEX vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCEEX

FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

EMO

EMO Risk / Return Rank: 20
EMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
EMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
EMO Omega Ratio Rank: 21
EMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
EMO Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCEEX vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCEEX	EMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.37	1.27	+2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	1.86	+2.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.24	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.63	1.94	+2.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.43	4.29	+14.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCEEX vs. EMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCEEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is higher than the EMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCEEX and EMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCEEX	EMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.37	1.27	+2.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.98	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.11	+0.57

Drawdowns

FCEEX vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCEEX drawdown since its inception was -34.68%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCEEX and EMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCEEX	EMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.68%	-95.06%	+60.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.98%	-10.87%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.47%	-18.81%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.90%	-28.59%	-5.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-93.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.64%	+6.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.26%	-31.96%	+20.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	4.90%	-1.65%

Volatility

FCEEX vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) at 6.24%. This indicates that FCEEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCEEX	EMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.77%	6.24%	+1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.07%	12.32%	+2.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.85%	16.62%	+1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.96%	26.74%	-9.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.37%	41.25%	-22.88%

FCEEX vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCEEX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCEEX vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison

FCEEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than EMO's 8.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund	8.61%	9.41%	7.16%	6.79%	6.71%	6.71%	15.82%	10.94%	16.39%	10.85%	9.76%	11.88%
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	2.25%	3.29%	4.17%	4.36%	4.08%	3.38%	2.98%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCEEX and EMO in my portfolio?

FCEEX and EMO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCEEX or EMO?

FCEEX has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to EMO (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCEEX dropped -34.68% vs EMO's -95.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCEEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.