FCDTX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M (FCDTX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
FCDTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 2007. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Performance
FCDTX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCDTX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCDTX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M | 0.26% | 13.73% | 13.89% | 18.79% | -18.70% | 24.02% | 21.08% | 29.68% | -9.50% | 10.97% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -11.15% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCDTX achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FCDTX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 11.00%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.55% annualized return.
FCDTX
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -8.46%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- 1Y
- 25.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
FBGRX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- -11.15%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- 1Y
- 22.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 18.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCDTX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCDTX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCDTX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FCDTX
FBGRX
FCDTX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M (FCDTX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCDTX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.91 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 1.43 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.36 | +0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 5.44 | +1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCDTX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.91 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.45 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.79 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.64 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCDTX and FBGRX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCDTX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FCDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than FBGRX's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCDTX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M | 0.41% | 0.42% | 2.47% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 11.15% | 1.50% | 1.91% | 23.15% | 10.48% | 1.20% | 6.83% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.14% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
FCDTX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCDTX drawdown since its inception was -65.78%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCDTX and FBGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCDTX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.78% | -58.64% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.84% | -13.89% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.78% | -43.08% | +12.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.48% | -43.08% | +4.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -12.65% | +2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.49% | -12.58% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 3.47% | -0.21% |
Volatility
FCDTX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M (FCDTX) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 6.13%. This indicates that FCDTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCDTX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 6.13% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 13.36% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.17% | 24.63% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 24.86% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 23.59% | -1.80% |