PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCDTX vs. FCNKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCDTX vs. FCNKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M (FCDTX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCDTX achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly higher than FCNKX's 8.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FCDTX has underperformed FCNKX with an annualized return of 12.13%, while FCNKX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.92% annualized return.


FCDTX

1D
-0.83%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
14.72%
6M
15.26%
1Y
39.27%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
12.13%

FCNKX

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.74%
YTD
8.01%
6M
10.16%
1Y
24.32%
3Y*
27.32%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
17.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCDTX vs. FCNKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCDTX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M
14.72%13.73%13.89%18.79%-18.70%24.02%21.08%29.68%-9.50%10.97%
FCNKX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund
8.01%21.88%36.08%39.50%-27.44%24.66%32.50%30.18%-2.27%32.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FCDTX and FCNKX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2008

0.81

The correlation between FCDTX and FCNKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCDTX vs. FCNKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCDTX
FCDTX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FCDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FCDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNKX
FCNKX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FCNKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCDTX vs. FCNKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M (FCDTX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCDTXFCNKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

1.84

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

2.55

+0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

2.30

+1.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.10

9.80

+5.30

FCDTX vs. FCNKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCDTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the FCNKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCDTX and FCNKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCDTXFCNKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

1.84

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.82

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.92

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.67

-0.35

Drawdowns

FCDTX vs. FCNKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCDTX drawdown since its inception was -65.78%, which is greater than FCNKX's maximum drawdown of -46.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCDTX and FCNKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCDTXFCNKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.78%

-46.44%

-19.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-11.29%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.56%

-19.73%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.78%

-31.77%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.48%

-31.77%

-6.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.59%

-0.30%

-2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-7.31%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.66%

-0.08%

Volatility

FCDTX vs. FCNKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M (FCDTX) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX) at 3.20%. This indicates that FCDTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCDTXFCNKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

3.20%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

10.51%

+2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

14.07%

+3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.61%

19.12%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

19.66%

+2.21%

FCDTX vs. FCNKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCDTX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNKX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCDTX vs. FCNKX - Dividend Comparison

FCDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than FCNKX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCDTX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M
0.36%0.42%2.47%0.00%0.04%11.15%1.50%1.91%23.15%10.48%1.20%6.83%
FCNKX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund
4.30%5.18%4.28%4.31%13.69%10.77%8.00%4.15%9.14%6.09%3.92%4.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCDTX and FCNKX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCDTX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to FCNKX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCDTX dropped -65.78% vs FCNKX's -46.44%.

FCDTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCDTX and FCNKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer