FCDTX vs. AZBIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FCDTX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M) and AZBIX (Virtus Small-Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FCDTX returned 12.24%/yr vs 11.77%/yr for AZBIX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FCDTX charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for AZBIX.

Performance

FCDTX vs. AZBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M (FCDTX) and Virtus Small-Cap Fund (AZBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCDTX achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly lower than AZBIX's 17.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCDTX having a 12.24% annualized return and AZBIX not far behind at 11.77%.

FCDTX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 15.80%
• 6M: 13.85%
• 1Y: 38.63%
• 3Y*: 19.18%
• 5Y*: 9.20%
• 10Y*: 12.24%

AZBIX

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 17.18%
• 6M: 16.12%
• 1Y: 32.63%
• 3Y*: 17.89%
• 5Y*: 8.04%
• 10Y*: 11.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCDTX vs. AZBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCDTX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M	15.80%	13.73%	13.89%	18.79%	-18.70%	24.02%	21.08%	29.68%	-9.50%	10.97%
AZBIX Virtus Small-Cap Fund	17.18%	8.49%	19.06%	14.09%	-18.04%	18.92%	16.98%	24.13%	-9.25%	21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FCDTX and AZBIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2013	0.96

The correlation between FCDTX and AZBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCDTX vs. AZBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCDTX

FCDTX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FCDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FCDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FCDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FCDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FCDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

AZBIX

AZBIX Risk / Return Rank: 54
AZBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
AZBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
AZBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
AZBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
AZBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCDTX vs. AZBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M (FCDTX) and Virtus Small-Cap Fund (AZBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCDTX	AZBIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.94	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	2.78	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.34	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	3.47	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.85	12.14	+2.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCDTX vs. AZBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCDTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the AZBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCDTX and AZBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCDTX	AZBIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	1.94	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.39	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.55	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.54	-0.22

Drawdowns

FCDTX vs. AZBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCDTX drawdown since its inception was -65.78%, which is greater than AZBIX's maximum drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCDTX and AZBIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCDTX	AZBIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.78%	-40.80%	-24.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.07%	-9.33%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.56%	-29.01%	+1.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.78%	-29.85%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.48%	-40.80%	+2.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.67%	-0.86%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.39%	-7.71%	-4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	2.66%	-0.07%

Volatility

FCDTX vs. AZBIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M (FCDTX) and Virtus Small-Cap Fund (AZBIX) have volatilities of 5.17% and 5.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCDTX	AZBIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	5.05%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.32%	12.17%	+1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.84%	16.72%	+1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.61%	20.50%	+1.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.87%	21.36%	+0.51%

FCDTX vs. AZBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCDTX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than AZBIX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCDTX vs. AZBIX - Dividend Comparison

FCDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than AZBIX's 4.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AZBIX Virtus Small-Cap Fund	4.18%	4.90%	10.82%	2.31%	4.78%	13.82%	0.45%	0.38%	9.62%	13.80%	0.03%	3.59%
FCDTX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class M	0.36%	0.42%	2.47%	0.00%	0.04%	11.15%	1.50%	1.91%	23.15%	10.48%	1.20%	6.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCDTX and AZBIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FCDTX and AZBIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCDTX or AZBIX?

FCDTX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to AZBIX (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCDTX dropped -65.78% vs AZBIX's -40.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCDTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.