FCDAX vs. TISBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX).
FCDAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 2007. TISBX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002.
Performance
FCDAX vs. TISBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCDAX vs. TISBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCDAX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A | 4.07% | 14.04% | 14.16% | 19.09% | -18.47% | 24.38% | 21.39% | 30.05% | -9.16% | 11.34% |
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund | 0.89% | 12.72% | 11.60% | 17.07% | -20.31% | 14.85% | 20.14% | 25.61% | -10.99% | 13.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCDAX achieves a 4.07% return, which is significantly higher than TISBX's 0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FCDAX has outperformed TISBX with an annualized return of 11.73%, while TISBX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.78% annualized return.
FCDAX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- 4.07%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
TISBX
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- -5.85%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 25.58%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCDAX vs. TISBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCDAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TISBX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCDAX vs. TISBX — Risk / Return Rank
FCDAX
TISBX
FCDAX vs. TISBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCDAX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 1.11 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 1.65 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.21 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 1.61 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.26 | 6.05 | +3.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCDAX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.11 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.16 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.42 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.36 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCDAX and TISBX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCDAX vs. TISBX - Dividend Comparison
FCDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than TISBX's 4.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCDAX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A | 0.43% | 0.44% | 2.61% | 0.02% | 0.08% | 10.93% | 1.44% | 1.96% | 22.71% | 10.34% | 1.43% | 6.93% |
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund | 4.09% | 4.12% | 6.82% | 3.09% | 1.97% | 8.96% | 2.65% | 5.16% | 9.29% | 4.49% | 4.03% | 4.77% |
Drawdowns
FCDAX vs. TISBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCDAX drawdown since its inception was -65.62%, which is greater than TISBX's maximum drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCDAX and TISBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCDAX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.62% | -56.50% | -9.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.83% | -13.90% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.67% | -31.89% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.46% | -41.69% | +3.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | -7.88% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -9.74% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 3.70% | -0.43% |
Volatility
FCDAX vs. TISBX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) at 7.49%. This indicates that FCDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TISBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCDAX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 7.49% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 14.50% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 23.37% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 22.58% | -0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 23.39% | -1.58% |