FCDAX vs. VIOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO).
FCDAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 2007. VIOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FCDAX vs. VIOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCDAX vs. VIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCDAX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A | 0.32% | 14.04% | 14.16% | 19.09% | -18.47% | 24.38% | 21.39% | 30.05% | -9.16% | 11.34% |
VIOO Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF | 3.49% | 6.04% | 8.48% | 16.16% | -16.26% | 26.79% | 11.47% | 22.68% | -8.65% | 13.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCDAX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than VIOO's 3.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FCDAX has outperformed VIOO with an annualized return of 11.32%, while VIOO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.84% annualized return.
FCDAX
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -8.46%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
VIOO
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 3.49%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 20.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCDAX vs. VIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCDAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOO's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCDAX vs. VIOO — Risk / Return Rank
FCDAX
VIOO
FCDAX vs. VIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCDAX | VIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.91 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.41 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 1.45 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 5.78 | +1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCDAX | VIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.91 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.19 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.43 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.54 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCDAX and VIOO is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCDAX vs. VIOO - Dividend Comparison
FCDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than VIOO's 1.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCDAX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A | 0.44% | 0.44% | 2.61% | 0.02% | 0.08% | 10.93% | 1.44% | 1.96% | 22.71% | 10.34% | 1.43% | 6.93% |
VIOO Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF | 1.31% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.51% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.32% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.26% |
Drawdowns
FCDAX vs. VIOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCDAX drawdown since its inception was -65.62%, which is greater than VIOO's maximum drawdown of -44.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCDAX and VIOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCDAX | VIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.62% | -44.15% | -21.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.83% | -14.66% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.67% | -27.93% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.46% | -44.15% | +5.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.85% | -5.80% | -4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -7.40% | -4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 3.67% | -0.42% |
Volatility
FCDAX vs. VIOO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) has a higher volatility of 6.87% compared to Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) at 6.34%. This indicates that FCDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCDAX | VIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 6.34% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 13.10% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 22.67% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 21.51% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 22.98% | -1.20% |