FCDAX vs. SWSSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX).
FCDAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 2007. SWSSX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 19, 1997.
Performance
FCDAX vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCDAX vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCDAX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A | 0.32% | 14.04% | 14.16% | 19.09% | -18.47% | 24.38% | 21.39% | 30.05% | -9.16% | 11.34% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | -2.49% | 12.88% | 11.57% | 17.07% | -20.43% | 14.77% | 20.12% | 25.63% | -11.19% | 14.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCDAX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than SWSSX's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FCDAX has outperformed SWSSX with an annualized return of 11.32%, while SWSSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.50% annualized return.
FCDAX
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -8.46%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
SWSSX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- -2.49%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 21.55%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCDAX vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCDAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCDAX vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank
FCDAX
SWSSX
FCDAX vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCDAX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.91 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.40 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 1.33 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 5.02 | +2.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCDAX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.91 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.14 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.40 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.33 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCDAX and SWSSX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCDAX vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison
FCDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than SWSSX's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCDAX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A | 0.44% | 0.44% | 2.61% | 0.02% | 0.08% | 10.93% | 1.44% | 1.96% | 22.71% | 10.34% | 1.43% | 6.93% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.66% | 1.49% | 1.32% | 8.88% | 2.55% | 6.12% | 10.45% | 5.22% | 4.10% | 6.92% |
Drawdowns
FCDAX vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCDAX drawdown since its inception was -65.62%, which is greater than SWSSX's maximum drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCDAX and SWSSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCDAX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.62% | -60.34% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.83% | -13.90% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.67% | -31.93% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.46% | -41.81% | +3.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.85% | -11.00% | +1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -10.78% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 3.68% | -0.43% |
Volatility
FCDAX vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) have volatilities of 6.87% and 6.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCDAX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 6.59% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 14.12% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 23.11% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 22.57% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 24.03% | -2.25% |