FCDAX vs. FMCDX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FCDAX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A) and FMCDX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - FCDAX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FMCDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FCDAX returned 13.34%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for FMCDX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCDAX charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for FMCDX.

Performance

FCDAX vs. FMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCDAX having a 19.40% return and FMCDX slightly higher at 19.99%. Over the past 10 years, FCDAX has outperformed FMCDX with an annualized return of 13.34%, while FMCDX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.39% annualized return.

FCDAX

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 19.40%
• 6M: 16.43%
• 1Y: 38.13%
• 3Y*: 20.57%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: 13.34%

FMCDX

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 19.99%
• 6M: 17.59%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 17.05%
• 5Y*: 8.35%
• 10Y*: 12.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCDAX vs. FMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCDAX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A	19.40%	14.04%	14.16%	19.09%	-18.47%	24.38%	21.39%	30.05%	-9.16%	11.34%
FMCDX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A	19.99%	10.17%	8.89%	16.86%	-14.11%	22.92%	12.77%	29.26%	-7.82%	19.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FCDAX and FMCDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2006	0.94

The correlation between FCDAX and FMCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCDAX vs. FMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCDAX

FCDAX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FCDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FCDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FCDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FCDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FCDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FMCDX

FMCDX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FMCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FMCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FMCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FMCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FMCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCDAX vs. FMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCDAX	FMCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	1.88	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	2.68	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.33	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	3.56	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.36	13.24	+2.12

FCDAX vs. FMCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the FMCDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCDAX and FMCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCDAX vs. FMCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCDAX drawdown since its inception was -65.62%, roughly equal to the maximum FMCDX drawdown of -65.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCDAX and FMCDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCDAX	FMCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.62%	-65.00%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.05%	-8.70%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.50%	-25.19%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.67%	-25.19%	-5.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.46%	-43.40%	+4.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-1.12%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.11%	-10.62%	-1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	2.34%	+0.27%

Volatility

FCDAX vs. FMCDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A (FCDAX) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX) at 5.26%. This indicates that FCDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCDAX	FMCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.35%	5.26%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.06%	12.77%	+1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.48%	16.55%	+1.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.67%	20.07%	+1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.88%	20.99%	+0.89%

FCDAX vs. FMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCDAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FMCDX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCDAX vs. FMCDX - Dividend Comparison

FCDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than FMCDX's 7.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCDAX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Small Cap Fund Class A	0.37%	0.44%	2.61%	0.02%	0.08%	10.93%	1.44%	1.96%	22.71%	10.34%	1.43%	6.93%
FMCDX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A	7.15%	8.58%	0.00%	0.61%	10.14%	13.43%	2.25%	4.16%	21.85%	4.30%	1.03%	9.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCDAX and FMCDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FCDAX and FMCDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCDAX or FMCDX?

FCDAX has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to FMCDX (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCDAX dropped -65.62% vs FMCDX's -65.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.