PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCDX vs. FMPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMCDX vs. FMPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A (FMPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCDX achieves a 21.35% return, which is significantly lower than FMPAX's 22.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCDX has outperformed FMPAX with an annualized return of 12.52%, while FMPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.72% annualized return.


FMCDX

1D
0.21%
1M
5.51%
YTD
21.35%
6M
19.13%
1Y
32.36%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
12.52%

FMPAX

1D
0.44%
1M
5.80%
YTD
22.92%
6M
21.65%
1Y
39.77%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
13.70%
10Y*
11.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMCDX vs. FMPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMCDX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A
21.35%10.17%8.89%16.86%-14.11%22.92%12.77%29.26%-7.82%19.57%
FMPAX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A
22.92%12.75%14.22%22.18%-10.89%33.60%0.68%23.19%-19.16%16.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCDX and FMPAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.93

The correlation between FMCDX and FMPAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMCDX vs. FMPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCDX
FMCDX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FMCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FMPAX
FMPAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FMPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FMPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMCDX vs. FMPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A (FMPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMCDXFMPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

3.96

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.50

15.21

-0.70

FMCDX vs. FMPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the FMPAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCDX and FMPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMCDX vs. FMPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCDX drawdown since its inception was -65.00%, roughly equal to the maximum FMPAX drawdown of -63.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCDX and FMPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCDXFMPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.00%

-63.15%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-10.34%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.19%

-23.79%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.19%

-23.79%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.40%

-45.47%

+2.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-9.71%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.69%

-0.35%

Volatility

FMCDX vs. FMPAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A (FMCDX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A (FMPAX) have volatilities of 5.07% and 5.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCDXFMPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

5.18%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.71%

12.52%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.54%

16.70%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.06%

20.20%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.04%

21.16%

-0.12%

FMCDX vs. FMPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMCDX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FMPAX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMCDX vs. FMPAX - Dividend Comparison

FMCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than FMPAX's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMCDX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Mid Cap Fund Class A
7.07%8.58%0.00%0.61%10.14%13.43%2.25%4.16%21.85%4.30%1.03%9.17%
FMPAX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A
6.36%8.24%10.38%0.96%13.09%1.08%1.78%1.61%14.62%8.77%1.11%4.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FMCDX and FMPAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FMPAX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to FMCDX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCDX dropped -65.00% vs FMPAX's -63.15%.

FMPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMCDX and FMPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer