FCCNX vs. RWIIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCCNX (Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C) and RWIIX (Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FCCNX returned 9.54%/yr vs 1.85%/yr for RWIIX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCCNX charges 1.90%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for RWIIX.

Performance

FCCNX vs. RWIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCCNX achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than RWIIX's 10.10% return.

FCCNX

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 6M: 11.21%
• 1Y: 17.46%
• 3Y*: 16.02%
• 5Y*: 9.54%
• 10Y*: 9.39%

RWIIX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 3.63%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 12.82%
• 1Y: 24.17%
• 3Y*: 5.50%
• 5Y*: 1.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCCNX vs. RWIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C	7.49%	24.54%	8.02%	13.45%	-7.16%	25.48%	3.30%	24.51%	-15.19%	1.31%
RWIIX Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund	10.10%	7.87%	-6.03%	9.07%	-11.57%	10.68%	14.57%	4.58%	-2.46%	0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FCCNX and RWIIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2017	0.49

The correlation between FCCNX and RWIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCCNX vs. RWIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCCNX

FCCNX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FCCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FCCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FCCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FCCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FCCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

RWIIX

RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCCNX vs. RWIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCCNX	RWIIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	2.14	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	2.96	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.41	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	3.41	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.46	9.13	-1.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCCNX vs. RWIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the RWIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCCNX and RWIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCCNX	RWIIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	2.14	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.16	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.38	-0.12

Drawdowns

FCCNX vs. RWIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCCNX drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than RWIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCNX and RWIIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCCNX	RWIIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.44%	-20.34%	-38.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.68%	-6.94%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.38%	-20.34%	+7.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.39%	-20.34%	-1.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	0.00%	-0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.31%	-7.82%	-5.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	2.59%	-0.24%

Volatility

FCCNX vs. RWIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) is 2.76%, while Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that FCCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCCNX	RWIIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	3.55%	-0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.88%	8.34%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.54%	11.06%	+1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.96%	11.53%	+4.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.43%	10.91%	+6.52%

FCCNX vs. RWIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCCNX has a 1.90% expense ratio, which is higher than RWIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCCNX vs. RWIIX - Dividend Comparison

FCCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than RWIIX's 7.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C	4.36%	4.69%	6.15%	2.29%	2.74%	3.65%	1.40%	3.06%	6.14%	0.91%	0.61%	0.15%
RWIIX Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund	7.93%	8.74%	0.00%	6.82%	1.72%	14.15%	6.51%	1.84%	0.86%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCCNX and RWIIX in my portfolio?

FCCNX and RWIIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCCNX or RWIIX?

RWIIX has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to FCCNX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCCNX dropped -58.44% vs RWIIX's -20.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.