PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCCNX vs. PRCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) and T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCCNX achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly higher than PRCNX's 4.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FCCNX has outperformed PRCNX with an annualized return of 9.30%, while PRCNX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.57% annualized return.


FCCNX

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.51%
YTD
6.60%
6M
11.13%
1Y
16.48%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
9.30%

PRCNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
4.49%
6M
7.53%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCCNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C
6.60%24.54%8.02%13.45%-7.16%25.48%3.30%24.51%-15.19%12.83%
PRCNX
T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund
4.49%27.91%1.64%16.90%-10.61%5.19%4.39%24.53%-10.69%19.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FCCNX and PRCNX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2014

0.72

The correlation between FCCNX and PRCNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCCNX vs. PRCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCCNX
FCCNX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FCCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FCCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

PRCNX
PRCNX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PRCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PRCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) and T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCCNXPRCNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

1.19

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

1.69

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.26

+1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.86

4.17

+3.69

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the PRCNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCCNX and PRCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCCNXPRCNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.19

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.43

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.50

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.40

-0.15

Drawdowns

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCCNX drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than PRCNX's maximum drawdown of -32.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCNX and PRCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCCNXPRCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.44%

-32.32%

-26.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.68%

-12.83%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.38%

-13.39%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.39%

-28.73%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.97%

-32.32%

-7.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-4.65%

+3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.31%

-6.17%

-7.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

3.86%

-1.51%

Volatility

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FCCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCCNXPRCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

0.00%

+2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

10.08%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

13.32%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

14.75%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

15.17%

+2.26%

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCCNX has a 1.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PRCNX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Dividend Comparison

FCCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than PRCNX's 29.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCCNX
Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C
4.40%4.69%6.15%2.29%2.74%3.65%1.40%3.06%6.14%0.91%0.61%0.15%
PRCNX
T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund
29.59%14.08%4.36%3.16%3.50%14.31%2.64%5.28%4.00%3.57%1.63%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCCNX and PRCNX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCCNX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to PRCNX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCCNX dropped -58.44% vs PRCNX's -32.32%.

FCCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCCNX and PRCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer