FCCNX vs. PRCNX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FCCNX (Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C) and PRCNX (T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FCCNX returned 9.38%/yr vs 7.56%/yr for PRCNX. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FCCNX charges 1.90%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for PRCNX.

Performance

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) and T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCCNX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than PRCNX's 4.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FCCNX has outperformed PRCNX with an annualized return of 9.38%, while PRCNX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.56% annualized return.

FCCNX

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 3.39%
• 6M: 8.11%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 1Y: 18.90%
• 3Y*: 14.94%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: 9.38%
• ALL TIME*: 5.33%

PRCNX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.29%
• YTD: 4.49%
• 1Y: 15.58%
• 3Y*: 11.60%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: 7.56%
• ALL TIME*: 5.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PRCNX T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C	8.62%	24.54%	8.02%	13.45%	-7.16%	25.48%	3.30%	24.51%	-15.19%	12.83%
PRCNX T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund	4.49%	27.91%	1.64%	16.90%	-10.61%	5.19%	4.39%	24.53%	-10.69%	19.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FCCNX and PRCNX is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2014	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between FCCNX and PRCNX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FCCNX vs. PRCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCCNX

FCCNX Risk / Return Rank: 49
FCCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FCCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FCCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
FCCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FCCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

PRCNX

PRCNX Risk / Return Rank: 38
PRCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
PRCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
PRCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
PRCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
PRCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) and T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCCNX	PRCNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.32	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	1.86	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.30	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	1.24	+1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.25	3.80	+3.46

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the PRCNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCCNX and PRCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCCNX drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than PRCNX's maximum drawdown of -32.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCNX and PRCNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCCNX	PRCNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.44%	-32.32%	-26.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.68%	-12.83%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.38%	-12.91%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.39%	-27.96%	+6.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.97%	-32.32%	-7.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-4.65%	+3.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.21%	-6.15%	-7.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	4.20%	-1.71%

Volatility

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C (FCCNX) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund (PRCNX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FCCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCCNX	PRCNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	0.00%	+2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.24%	9.41%	+0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.86%	12.20%	+0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.90%	14.61%	+1.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	14.79%	+2.56%

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCCNX has a 1.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PRCNX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCCNX vs. PRCNX - Dividend Comparison

FCCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than PRCNX's 29.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class C	4.32%	4.69%	6.15%	2.29%	2.74%	3.65%	1.40%	3.06%	6.14%	0.91%	0.61%	0.15%
PRCNX T. Rowe Price International Disciplined Equity Fund	29.59%	14.08%	4.36%	3.16%	3.50%	14.31%	2.64%	5.28%	4.00%	3.57%	1.63%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCCNX and PRCNX in my portfolio?

FCCNX and PRCNX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCCNX or PRCNX?

FCCNX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to PRCNX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCCNX dropped -58.44% vs PRCNX's -32.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.