FCCM.NEO vs. SLX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF (FCCM.NEO) and VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX).

FCCM.NEO and SLX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCCM.NEO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada Canadian Momentum Index. It was launched on Jun 5, 2020. SLX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Steel Index. It was launched on Oct 16, 2006. Both FCCM.NEO and SLX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FCCM.NEO vs. SLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF (FCCM.NEO) and VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FCCM.NEO vs. SLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FCCM.NEO Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF	5.42%	43.17%	27.03%	10.10%	-3.42%	14.23%	-64.10%
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF	9.65%	40.69%	-10.89%	28.36%	22.42%	26.53%	44.81%

Different Trading Currencies

FCCM.NEO is traded in CAD, while SLX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCCM.NEO achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly lower than SLX's 9.65% return.

FCCM.NEO

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -6.21%
• YTD: 5.42%
• 6M: 15.69%
• 1Y: 44.65%
• 3Y*: 28.73%
• 5Y*: 18.43%
• 10Y*: —

SLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -7.12%
• YTD: 9.65%
• 6M: 25.52%
• 1Y: 47.38%
• 3Y*: 17.07%
• 5Y*: 17.44%
• 10Y*: 18.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCCM.NEO vs. SLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCCM.NEO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SLX's 0.56% expense ratio.

SLX

VanEck Vectors Steel ETF

FCCM.NEO

Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF

Return for Risk

FCCM.NEO vs. SLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCCM.NEO

FCCM.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 95
FCCM.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FCCM.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FCCM.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
FCCM.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FCCM.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

SLX

SLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
SLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
SLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SLX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
SLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SLX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCCM.NEO vs. SLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF (FCCM.NEO) and VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCCM.NEO	SLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	1.81	+0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	2.40	+0.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.33	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.67	3.01	+0.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.45	9.69	+5.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCCM.NEO vs. SLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCCM.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the SLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCCM.NEO and SLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCCM.NEO	SLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	1.81	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.39	0.70	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.35	-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between FCCM.NEO and SLX is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FCCM.NEO vs. SLX - Dividend Comparison

FCCM.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than SLX's 1.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCCM.NEO Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF	0.86%	0.91%	0.91%	1.32%	1.79%	1.49%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF	1.41%	1.55%	3.56%	2.80%	4.97%	7.07%	1.87%	3.44%	6.26%	2.50%	1.06%	5.35%

Drawdowns

FCCM.NEO vs. SLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCCM.NEO drawdown since its inception was -67.22%, roughly equal to the maximum SLX drawdown of -65.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCM.NEO and SLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCCM.NEO	SLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.22%	-82.14%	+14.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.36%	-16.35%	+3.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.59%	-33.62%	+17.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.76%	-9.02%	-7.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.20%	-39.05%	-14.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.94%	5.03%	-2.09%

Volatility

FCCM.NEO vs. SLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF (FCCM.NEO) is 7.18%, while VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) has a volatility of 8.34%. This indicates that FCCM.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCCM.NEO	SLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.18%	8.34%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.86%	17.27%	-4.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.93%	26.26%	-9.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.35%	25.21%	-11.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.53%	28.63%	+1.90%